{"id":35879,"date":"2018-05-19T01:00:25","date_gmt":"2018-05-19T05:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=35879"},"modified":"2018-06-16T12:50:24","modified_gmt":"2018-06-16T16:50:24","slug":"qotd-operation-keeping-up-appearances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2018\/05\/19\/qotd-operation-keeping-up-appearances\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Operation “keeping up appearances”"},"content":{"rendered":"

It\u2019s hard to blame the Army, and even if it wasn\u2019t not all of even most of the blame can be laid at the Army\u2019s doorstep.<\/p>\n

Government, both Conservative and Liberal kept repeating Pierre Trudeau\u2019s lie<\/em><\/strong><\/font> that \u201cwe\u2019re here and we\u2019re doing our full, fair and agreed upon share.\u201d Kudos to Prime Minister Mulroney who, when faced with irrefutable and embarrassingly public evidence that we simply could not deploy and sustain two small brigades in war, cancelled the North Norway brigade commitment and pulled the Germany-based brigade back to Canada.<\/p>\n

\"canadian-defence-spending-ted-campbell\"<\/p>\n

This graph, which is only rough, being drawn from three different sources and \u201crounded\u201d for ease of plotting, shows, essentially, what happened between 1964 (Prime Minister Pearson) and 2014 Prime Minister Harper). As you can see defence spending as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product ~ a fair measure of our national, political commitment to our defence of Canada and of our allies and neighbours, has declined steadily even though, generally, with one \u201cblip\u201d in the Chr\u00e9tien era, when he was trying to wrestle with the deficit, the actual dollars spent on defence have grown in number. What it really shows is that our GDP grew a lot in the past 50 years ~ it\u2019s now almost $2.5 Trillion<\/strong> (that\u2019s $2,500,000,000,000.00) ~ but our political willingness (or appreciation of the necessity) to spend 2% of GDP, as we did in about 1970s and as we have, sort of, agreed (in NATO) do aspire<\/em><\/strong> to do again, has not kept pace with our increasing prosperity. In fact, while the dollars spend on defence have doubled, in 50 years, the % of GDP spent of defence has fallen to \u2153 of its 1964 level. But ministers\u2019 desires to \u201ctalk good fight\u201d remain at historically high levels and even as resources shrink admirals and generals are told to “keep up appearances”. That, keeping up appearances, was what the admirals and generals wanted to do \u2026 no one really wanted to go into various international military fora and say \u201cas our resources decline we\u2019re going to have to do less,\u201d instead they went out and said “we\u2019re learning new ways to do more with less,” which is, of course, utter nonsense. Meanwhile more and more quite senior officers came back from tours of duty in the USA and brought with them some very American ideas about organization and management. Now American organizational models might work very well for armies with 1,000,000+ soldiers, or even for those with 495,000, like South Korea\u2019s perhaps, even for those with 100,000+ like the French army, but they are not always or even often suitable for an army with 20,000\u00b1 regulars and 25,000\u00b1 reservists. The new organizations might make us look bigger, on paper, but they hide the fact the army has been hollowed out since 1970.<\/p>\n

The Army of 1964, the one that consumed its fair share of the 3% of GDP that Canada spent on defence had four brigades, the largest had about 6,500 soldiers in it, the smaller ones had about 5,000 each. That was more men and women in combat units than we have in the entire, top heavy, Canadian Army today in total. But we still have three of the four brigades, we have nine instead of 13 battalions of infantry and three instead of four regiments of artillery \u2026 but how? Simple: it\u2019s the Potemkin village<\/em>, again, battalions that should have 950 soldiers have 500 \u2026 if their lucky. In fact there are no combat ready infantry battalions. Any battalion being readied for operations must be reinforced from other infantry battalions \u2026 we have nine battalion commanders and nine regimental sergeants major and so on but we only have enough soldiers in rifle platoons to staff five battalions \u2026 maybe only four if the battalions are properly equipped with mortars and heavy assault weapons. Why?<\/em><\/strong> Because no one, not ministers, not senior civil servants and not the generals want to \u201ccut his coat according to his cloth.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ted Campbell, “A Canadian Potemkin Village”, Ted Campbell’s Point of View<\/em><\/a>, 2016-09-15.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It\u2019s hard to blame the Army, and even if it wasn\u2019t not all of even most of the blame can be laid at the Army\u2019s doorstep. Government, both Conservative and Liberal kept repeating Pierre Trudeau\u2019s lie that \u201cwe\u2019re here and we\u2019re doing our full, fair and agreed upon share.\u201d Kudos to Prime Minister Mulroney who, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,7,5,53,41],"tags":[31,829,448,511,1211],"class_list":["post-35879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-history","category-military","category-politics","category-quotations","tag-army","tag-brianmulroney","tag-canadianforces","tag-pierretrudeau","tag-potemkinvillage"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-9kH","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35879"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35879\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43268,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35879\/revisions\/43268"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}