{"id":34985,"date":"2020-05-19T01:00:40","date_gmt":"2020-05-19T05:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=34985"},"modified":"2020-05-18T08:15:51","modified_gmt":"2020-05-18T12:15:51","slug":"qotd-amour-propre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2020\/05\/19\/qotd-amour-propre\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: <em>Amour-propre<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:left; padding: 0px 15px 0px 0px\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"400\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-48672\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400.png 400w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/QotD-thumbnail-400x400-50x50.png 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a>The French have this wonderful word, <em>amour-propre<\/em>, so much better than our English &#8220;self-love.&#8221; It comes, with its edge, from La Rochefoucauld, his urbane and scintillating <em>Maxims<\/em> in the seventeenth century. It is the arch-flatterer, &#8220;more artful than the most artful of mankind.&#8221; In parallel, it comes from Blaise Pascal, who observes that Christianity is the only cure. Then it comes again through Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in the &#8220;enlightened&#8221; eighteenth century, who thought the primitive savages incapable of <em>amour-propre<\/em>, because they lacked the gilt-framed mirrors of sophisticated society, in which their pride might be reflected. He imagines it the source of all corruption; and with some authority, for he was himself among the most corrupt of men \u2014 this Rousseau who taught us all to &#8220;blame society.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Really there is nothing new under the sun, and the concept comes much earlier from Saint Augustine of Hippo who in his <em>City of God<\/em> calls it in Latin, <em>amor sui<\/em>, and puts it about the centre of his review of human tawdriness. That, in turn, is how it came to Pascal: via the French Augustinians, with whom Pascal was in thick, about the time he was writing his <em>Lettres provinciales<\/em>. One might add, <em>contre<\/em> Rousseau (and perhaps with Joseph de Maistre) that it goes back farther, to Adam and Eve.<\/p>\n<p>Ye devill appeals to Eve&#8217;s <em>amour-propre<\/em>. She then appeals to Adam&#8217;s. That&#8217;s how this whole wretched mess got started. Note that this couple predeceased all Rousseau&#8217;s noble savages, and that the field anthropologists have since discovered that the primitive tribal types are a lot like us. Which is to say, bad, in many colourful ways, and quite invariably self-regarding.<\/p>\n<p>David Warren, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.davidwarrenonline.com\/2016\/06\/01\/amour-propre\/?&#038;owa_medium=feed&#038;owa_sid=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">&#8220;Amour-propre&#8221;, <em>Essays in Idleness<\/em><\/a>, 2016-06-01.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The French have this wonderful word, amour-propre, so much better than our English &#8220;self-love.&#8221; It comes, with its edge, from La Rochefoucauld, his urbane and scintillating Maxims in the seventeenth century. It is the arch-flatterer, &#8220;more artful than the most artful of mankind.&#8221; In parallel, it comes from Blaise Pascal, who observes that Christianity is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,1117,57,41],"tags":[209,360,576,139,1182],"class_list":["post-34985","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-france","category-humour","category-quotations","tag-anthropology","tag-christianity","tag-philosophy","tag-psychology","tag-rousseau"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-96h","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34985","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34985"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34985\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57250,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34985\/revisions\/57250"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}