{"id":33128,"date":"2017-07-21T01:00:40","date_gmt":"2017-07-21T05:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=33128"},"modified":"2017-07-11T11:21:07","modified_gmt":"2017-07-11T15:21:07","slug":"qotd-anachronistic-regency-romances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2017\/07\/21\/qotd-anachronistic-regency-romances\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Anachronistic &#8220;Regency&#8221; romances"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>Which brings us to a discussion about romances, yesterday. Like apparently most people who read Regencies I\u2019ve become aware of a tendency for them to read more and more like modern romances than like something set in that time.<\/p>\n<p>Someone nailed it for me by pointing out that female characters have been getting more modern. For instance, they will do things like not want to marry UNTIL they have sexual experience, so they\u2019ll be engaged and go out to find someone to sleep with them: in a time without either contraceptives or antibiotics and in a time when a unwed pregnancy would ruin not only the woman but all her relatives.<\/p>\n<p>Or they rebel against being the one who was supposed to marry to make the family fortunes. I\u2019m not saying a woman might not wish to marry someone else rather than make the family fortunes, but it would present in her own mind not as resentment to lifting the family out of debt, but as \u201cI\u2019m madly in love with the stable boy.\u201d or whatever. And if a woman was thoroughly opposed to [being] married, it often manifested (at least in Catholic countries, granted, not England) as a \u201cvocation.\u201d What it didn\u2019t manifest as was \u201cI want to pursue a career.\u201d Women married, or if they were unmarried stayed around the house helping with the nephews and the running of the house. If they had the means they might set up household with a companion. But only the poor worked, (even for men \u201chaving to\u201d work was a downcheck on status.) If you were a governess or a nurse, it wasn\u2019t for a \u201ccareer\u201d but because you were desperate.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, and please save me from all the women running philanthropic organizations. While there were of course a number of these run by women, it wasn\u2019t every other woman as seems to be in today\u2019s regency romances. And charities for unmarried mothers would be very heavy on the preaching and getting them to give the baby up for adoption. Not telling them they\u2019ve done nothing wrong and \u201caffirming\u201d their choices. Again, no contraceptives, no antibiotics. Sex and its consequences were serious business PARTICULARLY for women who make more of an investment in reproduction.<\/p>\n<p>Sarah A. Hoyt, <a href=\"http:\/\/accordingtohoyt.com\/2015\/08\/03\/what-has-gone-before-us\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;What Has Gone Before Us&#8221;, <em>According to Hoyt<\/em><\/a>, 2015-08-03.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which brings us to a discussion about romances, yesterday. Like apparently most people who read Regencies I\u2019ve become aware of a tendency for them to read more and more like modern romances than like something set in that time. Someone nailed it for me by pointing out that female characters have been getting more modern. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,7,41],"tags":[86,1138,43],"class_list":["post-33128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-history","category-quotations","tag-criticism","tag-thepastisaforeigncountry","tag-women"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-8Ck","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33128"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33128\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33129,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33128\/revisions\/33129"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}