{"id":32590,"date":"2015-09-15T01:00:12","date_gmt":"2015-09-15T05:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=32590"},"modified":"2015-09-02T20:35:34","modified_gmt":"2015-09-03T00:35:34","slug":"qotd-the-ex-im-bank","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2015\/09\/15\/qotd-the-ex-im-bank\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: The Ex-Im Bank"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>&#8230; every time the Ex-Im Bank gets involved in a deal, there are only two possibilities: The government is needlessly subsidizing something that would have happened anyway, giving away cheap money to a huge corporation. Or else it&#8217;s subsidizing a deal that <em>wouldn&#8217;t<\/em> have happened anyway, in which case we are defending the use of taxpayer dollars to sell cheap manufactured goods to foreigners. It&#8217;s not even as if we&#8217;re picking out especially needy foreigners, who may require a charitable contribution from the prosperous citizens of the United States; the subsidy is distributed on the basis of who is willing to, say, buy cut-rate U.S. airframes. And guess who benefits? U.S. corporations that export a lot.<\/p>\n<p>This is not a good use of taxpayer dollars, and conservative ideologues, bless their hearts, are quite right to want to get rid of it. Their passion is a little out of proportion to the harm that this agency does, but even a small step in the right direction is better than none. The bank&#8217;s opponents concede that. For them, the appeal of taking on Ex-Im is that they might be able to take it down.<\/p>\n<p>Against this impeccable economic and political logic, the bank&#8217;s supporters marshal a few arguments. First, they often claim (as Nocera implies) that the Ex-Im Bank generates a lot of money for the Treasury. Which is sort of true &#8230; except. First of all, it doesn&#8217;t account for the opportunity costs of the distortion; resources are diverted into production of certain goods, and away from others. And second of all, government accounting for loans is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloombergview.com\/articles\/2015-04-09\/uncle-sam-is-uneducated-about-loan-risks\" target=\"_blank\">rather weird<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbo.gov\/publication\/45383\" target=\"_blank\">According to the Congressional Budget Office<\/a>, if we used a fair value accounting method, which would account for the risk of changing market conditions, the Ex-Im Bank&#8217;s six largest programs would be generating a deficit, not a surplus.<\/p>\n<p>We are also told that Ex-Im is a vital matter of national security. I&#8217;m going out on a limb here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure that if the U.S. government needs to find some money to give foreigners as a vital matter of national security, they will manage to find it even if the Ex-Im Bank is shuttered and its silent halls hold only the lingering ghosts of departed exporters.<\/p>\n<p>Megan McArdle, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloombergview.com\/articles\/2015-08-03\/ex-im-bank-is-a-tiny-but-tempting-target\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Ex-Im Bank Is a Tiny But Tempting Target&#8221;, <em>Bloomberg View<\/em><\/a>, 2015-08-03.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230; every time the Ex-Im Bank gets involved in a deal, there are only two possibilities: The government is needlessly subsidizing something that would have happened anyway, giving away cheap money to a huge corporation. Or else it&#8217;s subsidizing a deal that wouldn&#8217;t have happened anyway, in which case we are defending the use of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[831,53,41,13],"tags":[436,645,727,793],"class_list":["post-32590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-politics","category-quotations","category-usa","tag-banking","tag-corporatewelfare","tag-cronycapitalism","tag-subsidies"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-8tE","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32590"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32590\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32593,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32590\/revisions\/32593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}