{"id":32212,"date":"2015-08-03T03:00:45","date_gmt":"2015-08-03T07:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=32212"},"modified":"2019-05-19T11:47:01","modified_gmt":"2019-05-19T15:47:01","slug":"camille-paglia-on-the-presidential-race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2015\/08\/03\/camille-paglia-on-the-presidential-race\/","title":{"rendered":"Camille Paglia on the presidential race"},"content":{"rendered":"

From the third and final part of the Camille Paglia interview<\/a> in Salon<\/em>:<\/p>\n

First of all, when we look at the abundance of candidates who have put themselves forward on the GOP side, compared to the complete paralysis of the Democratic party by the Clinton machine, I think you have to be worried about the future of the Democratic party. Young feminists are asking why there hasn\u2019t been a woman president and automatically blaming it on male sexism. But there are plenty of women Democratic politicians who are too scared to put themselves forward as candidates because of the Clinton machine. There\u2019s something seriously wrong here with Democratic thinking. You either believe in the country, you believe in your party, or you don\u2019t!<\/p>\n

Given the problems facing the nation, this passive waiting for your turn is simply unacceptable. The Democrats have plenty of solid, capable women politicians who are just too timid to challenge the party establishment. Well, excuse me, that proves they don\u2019t deserve to be president! You sure won\u2019t be able to deal with ISIS if you can\u2019t deal with Debbie Wasserman Schultz! The paucity of declared Democratic presidential candidates is a major embarrassment to the party. Look at that herd of eager-beaver competitive guys on the Republican side \u2013 overflowing with energy and ambition. There\u2019s even a woman, Carly Fiorina, who has no political experience and therefore no chance of winning, but she is bravely putting herself forward and speaking out. And she has impressively informed herself about international politics, which is a No. 1 requirement for any woman presidential candidate. I said in a recent op-ed for Time<\/em><\/a> that women must take responsibility for mastering more than the usual social welfare issues. Women politicians have to develop themselves beyond the caretaking side of the spectrum. All this talk about the lack of women engineers and how that\u2019s somehow evidence of sexism \u2013 oh, really? It\u2019s mostly a self-selecting process, as proved by the way that the overwhelming majority of women politicians around the world actually behave. What do they instantly gravitate towards? Social welfare, caretaking, the environment. They ignore military history and strategic geopolitics.<\/p>\n

I have constantly said that Senator Dianne Feinstein should have been the leading woman presidential candidate for the Democratic party long ago. Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi is a very deft and clever behind-the-scenes legislator and dealmaker, a skill she acquired from her political family \u2013 her father and brother were mayors of Baltimore. Both of these women, to me, are far better politicians than Hillary Clinton. Hillary has accomplished nothing substantial in her life. She\u2019s been pushed along, coasting on her husband\u2019s coattails, and every job she\u2019s been given fizzled out into time-serving or overt disaster. Hillary constantly strikes attitudes and claims she\u2019s \u201cpassionate\u201d about this or that, but there\u2019s never any sustained follow-through. She\u2019s just a classic, corporate exec or bureaucrat type who would prefer to be at her desk behind closed doors, imposing her power schemes on the proletariat. She has no discernible political skills of any kind, which is why she needs a big, shifting army of consultants, advisors, and toadies to whisper in her ear and write her policy statements. There\u2019s this ridiculous new theme in the media about people needing to learn who the \u201creal\u201d Hillary Clinton is. What?<\/em> Everything they\u2019re saying about what a wonderful person Hillary is in private tells us that she\u2019s not competent or credible as a public figure! A politician, particularly a president, must have a distinct skill or expertise in communicating with the masses. It\u2019s the absolutely basic requirement for any career in politics.<\/p>\n

If you don\u2019t have an effective public persona, if you\u2019re not a good speaker, if you don\u2019t like to press the flesh, if you\u2019re not nimble enough to deal with anything that comes along, then you are not a natural politician! And you sure aren\u2019t going to learn it in your late 60s! Get off the stage, and let someone else truly electable on! All this silly talk about how wonderful Hillary is in private. Oh, sure, she\u2019s nice to the important people and the people she wants or needs something from! Then she\u2019s Pollyanna herself! There are just too many reports stretching all the way back to Arkansas about Hillary\u2019s nasty outbursts toward underlings when things aren\u2019t going well. The main point is that the ability to communicate with millions of people is a special talent, and Hillary pretty obviously lacks it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

From the third and final part of the Camille Paglia interview in Salon: First of all, when we look at the abundance of candidates who have put themselves forward on the GOP side, compared to the complete paralysis of the Democratic party by the Clinton machine, I think you have to be worried about the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[53,13],"tags":[1288,768,188,670],"class_list":["post-32212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-usa","tag-camillepaglia","tag-democrat","tag-electionwatch","tag-hillaryclinton"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-8ny","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32212"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32212\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32213,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32212\/revisions\/32213"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}