{"id":32198,"date":"2015-08-01T03:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-01T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=32198"},"modified":"2015-10-11T13:43:53","modified_gmt":"2015-10-11T17:43:53","slug":"ayn-rands-ideal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2015\/08\/01\/ayn-rands-ideal\/","title":{"rendered":"Ayn Rand’s Ideal<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

In Vice<\/em>, Milo Yiannopoulos<\/a> discusses the long-lost-then-found early Ayn Rand novella Ideal<\/em>, which Rand reworked into a play:<\/p>\n

According to Michael Paxton, who directed the world premiere of the play in 1989, Ideal <\/em>gives readers an insight into Rand’s state of mind in the early 1930s: Her first novel, We The Living<\/em>, had been rejected by publishers for being “too intellectual,” and the writer was struggling with odd jobs, having recently moved to the United States.<\/p>\n

“It examines the artist’s process,” Paxton told me from his hotel room in North Carolina, where he was set to give a talk at the Ayn Rand Institute’s Objectivist Summer Conference. “How do you be an artist and live in the world at the same time? It’s amazing how, once you’ve lived a little in the world, you can really understand these characters and the issues they’re dealing with \u2014 not being understood, thinking the world doesn’t care whether you live or die.”<\/p>\n

His assessment is not universal. Perhaps predictably, the New York Times<\/em> hated the play when it premiered off-Broadway in 2010, concluding that, “the show’s clumsy mix of long bursts of theory and a laborious plot would test the endurance of even Alan Greenspan, a famous Rand admirer and veteran of long, boring meetings.”<\/p>\n

As a play, Ideal <\/em>went unperformed for 60 years after its writing, and was never seen on stage in Rand’s lifetime, though Paxton says that may have something to do with its practical demands: The play has 37 characters and tons of set changes. But he thinks it’s worth the effort: “What’s surprising about the play is that it has a lot of humour, and a lot of satire in how it makes fun of organized religion. It’s subtle, and very funny.”<\/p>\n

The good news is the new edition also includes the entire play script. So you can gather 37 of your closest right-wing nutcase allies \u2014 or lefty culture jammers, as you prefer \u2014 and stage it yourself to find out.<\/p>\n

Ideal <\/em>the novel, which Rand herself set aside as unsatisfactory, is less polished than the stage version, and, despite flashes of Randian flair, there is evidence that the author was still struggling to find her voice. Readers familiar with The Fountainhead<\/em> will recognize the seeds of that work in this early effort. Thankfully, though, Ideal <\/em>is not one of those works of juvenilia that ought to have remained lost.<\/p>\n

Rand’s critics, often humourless literalists, will find plenty in Ideal <\/em>to gnaw on: There’s the classically Randian was-it-rape-or-wasn’t-it sex scene and a blisteringly heartless remark after a death that will have fans sniggering and detractors drumming up all the manufactured fury they can muster. And, yes, Rand’s writing can be a bit… much.<\/p>\n

But profound, existential loneliness, coupled with a Buffy the Vampire Slayer<\/em>\u2013esque sense of ordained personal greatness is why so many cheerleaders for capitalism relate to Rand’s lead characters, from Gonda to The Fountainhead<\/em>‘s Dominique Francon. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Vice, Milo Yiannopoulos discusses the long-lost-then-found early Ayn Rand novella Ideal, which Rand reworked into a play: According to Michael Paxton, who directed the world premiere of the play in 1989, Ideal gives readers an insight into Rand’s state of mind in the early 1930s: Her first novel, We The Living, had been rejected […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,10,13],"tags":[67,86,381],"class_list":["post-32198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-liberty","category-usa","tag-aynrand","tag-criticism","tag-theatre"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-8nk","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32198"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32199,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32198\/revisions\/32199"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}