{"id":31640,"date":"2016-11-27T01:00:16","date_gmt":"2016-11-27T06:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=31640"},"modified":"2016-11-17T09:24:32","modified_gmt":"2016-11-17T14:24:32","slug":"qotd-fabric-as-technology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2016\/11\/27\/qotd-fabric-as-technology\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: Fabric as technology"},"content":{"rendered":"

In February 1939, Vogue<\/em> ran a major feature on the fashions of the future. Inspired by the soon-to-open New York World\u2019s Fair, the magazine asked nine industrial designers to imagine what the people of \u2018a far Tomorrow\u2019 might wear and why. (The editors deemed fashion designers too of-the-moment for such speculations.) A mock\u2011up of each outfit was manufactured and photographed for a lavish nine-page colour spread.<\/p>\n

You might have seen some of the results online: an evening dress with a see-through net top and strategically placed swirls of gold braid, for instance, or a baggy men\u2019s jumpsuit with a utility belt and halo antenna. Bloggers periodically rediscover a British newsreel of models demonstrating the outfits while a campy narrator (\u2018Oh, swish!\u2019) makes laboured jokes. The silly get\u2011ups are always good for self-satisfied smirks. What dopes those old-time prognosticators were!<\/p>\n

The ridicule is unfair. Anticipating climate-controlled interiors, greater nudity, more athleticism, more travel and simpler wardrobes, the designers actually got a lot of trends right. Besides, the mock\u2011ups don\u2019t reveal what really made the predicted fashions futuristic. Looking only at the pictures, you can\u2019t detect the most prominent technological theme.<\/p>\n

\u2018The important improvements and innovations in clothes for the World of Tomorrow will be in the fabrics themselves,\u2019 declared Raymond Loewy, one of the Vogue<\/em> contributors. His fellow visionaries agreed. Every single one talked about textile advances. Many of their designs specified yet-to-be-invented materials that could adjust to temperature, change colour or be crushed into suitcases without wrinkling. Without exception, everyone foretelling the \u2018World of Tomorrow\u2019 believed that an exciting future meant innovative new fabrics.<\/p>\n

They all understood something we\u2019ve largely forgotten: that textiles are technology, more ancient than bronze and as contemporary as nanowires. We hairless apes co-evolved with our apparel. But, to reverse Arthur C Clarke\u2019s adage, any sufficiently familiar technology is indistinguishable from nature. It seems intuitive, obvious \u2013 so woven into the fabric of our lives that we take it for granted.<\/p>\n

Virginia Postrel, “Losing the Thread: Older than bronze and as new as nanowires, textiles are technology \u2014 and they have remade our world time and again”, Aeon<\/em><\/a>, 2015-06-05.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In February 1939, Vogue ran a major feature on the fashions of the future. Inspired by the soon-to-open New York World\u2019s Fair, the magazine asked nine industrial designers to imagine what the people of \u2018a far Tomorrow\u2019 might wear and why. (The editors deemed fashion designers too of-the-moment for such speculations.) A mock\u2011up of each […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,41,15],"tags":[618,140,686,174],"class_list":["post-31640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-quotations","category-technology","tag-clothing","tag-design","tag-futurism","tag-innovation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-8ek","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31640"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31640\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31641,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31640\/revisions\/31641"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}