{"id":31628,"date":"2015-06-12T05:00:33","date_gmt":"2015-06-12T09:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=31628"},"modified":"2015-06-11T21:53:05","modified_gmt":"2015-06-12T01:53:05","slug":"reason-becomes-a-doj-target-because-commenters-disrespected-a-judge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2015\/06\/12\/reason-becomes-a-doj-target-because-commenters-disrespected-a-judge\/","title":{"rendered":"Reason<\/em> becomes a DOJ target because commenters disrespected a judge"},"content":{"rendered":"

Every now and again, it’s easy to believe that we’ve somehow slipped down a hole in time to a less free, more authoritarian time. This is the kind of thing you could easily imagine happening in Fascist Italy or Franco’s Spain<\/a> rather than in the United States in 2015:<\/p>\n

The United States Department of Justice is using federal grand jury subpoenas to identify anonymous commenters engaged in typical internet bluster and hyperbole in connection with the Silk Road prosecution. DOJ is targeting Reason.com<\/em>, a leading libertarian website whose clever writing is eclipsed only by the blowhard stupidity of its commenting peanut gallery.<\/p>\n

Why is the government using its vast power to identify these obnoxious asshats, and not the other tens of thousands who plague the internet?<\/p>\n

Because these<\/em> twerps mouthed off about a judge<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Last week, a source provided me with a federal grand jury subpoena. The subpoena, issued by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, is directed to Reason.com in Washington, D.C.. The subpoena commands Reason to provide the grand jury “any and all identifying information” Reason has about participants in what the subpoena calls a “chat.”<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

Regrettably, The Government Can Probably Abuse the Grand Jury Subpoena Power This Way<\/strong><\/p>\n

The grand jury’s investigative power \u2014 exercised nominally on its behalf by the U.S. Attorney’s office \u2014 is nearly unchecked. It’s not like a stop-and-frisk or search; the government doesn’t need reasonable suspicion or probable case to use grand jury subpoenas to seek information. In general, one can only challenge grand jury subpoenas when they are irrationally burdensome (like demanding that Apple produce every document about iPhones in its possession) or for an improper purpose (like using the grand jury to improve trial evidence after an indictment has already been returned) or, very rarely, when privacy or constitutional issues are in play.<\/p>\n

Reason.com<\/em> \u2014 or the anonymous commenters \u2014 could file an action in federal court seeking to quash this subpoena. We know how that would likely come out, because someone recently did it. During the 2012 election cycle a juvenile but prolific Twitter personality named “Mr. X” tweeted \u201cI want to fuck Michelle Bachman in the ass with a Vietnam era machete.\u201d The government subpoenaed Twitter for Mr. X’s identifying information; Mr. X filed a motion to quash the subpoena. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Every now and again, it’s easy to believe that we’ve somehow slipped down a hole in time to a less free, more authoritarian time. This is the kind of thing you could easily imagine happening in Fascist Italy or Franco’s Spain rather than in the United States in 2015: The United States Department of Justice […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,28,53,13],"tags":[186,267,550],"class_list":["post-31628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberty","category-media","category-politics","category-usa","tag-freedomofspeech","tag-justice","tag-libertarianism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-8e8","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31628"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31630,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31628\/revisions\/31630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}