{"id":30854,"date":"2015-04-03T02:00:43","date_gmt":"2015-04-03T06:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=30854"},"modified":"2015-03-31T15:03:40","modified_gmt":"2015-03-31T19:03:40","slug":"perhaps-the-new-york-times-needs-to-back-away-from-science-coverage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2015\/04\/03\/perhaps-the-new-york-times-needs-to-back-away-from-science-coverage\/","title":{"rendered":"Perhaps the New York Times<\/em> needs to back away from science coverage"},"content":{"rendered":"

Alex B. Berezow<\/a> makes a case for the venerable New York Times<\/em> to not cover science stories:<\/p>\n

What has gone so wrong for the NYT<\/em>? Many things are to blame. The paper’s leftish editorial page is out of step with a large portion of the American public. A high-profile scandal, in which journalist Jayson Blair was caught fabricating articles<\/a>, damaged its credibility. The biggest factor, however, is the rise of credible challengers — both print and digital — that simply do better journalism. There is little incentive to spend money to read the NYT<\/em> when superior news coverage (and more sensible editorializing) can be found elsewhere.<\/p>\n

The NYT<\/em>‘s science coverage is particularly galling. While the paper does employ a staff of decent journalists (including several excellent writers, such as Carl Zimmer and John Tierney), its overall science coverage is trite. Other outlets cover the same stories (and many more), in ways that are both more in-depth and more interesting. (They are also usually free to read.) Worst of all, too much of NYT<\/em>‘s science journalism is egregiously wrong.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

Reliance on fringe, pseudoscientific sources has become something of a trend at the NYT<\/em>. Its most deplorable reportage involves the science of food, particularly GMOs. Henry Miller, the former founding director of the FDA’s Office of Biotechnology, reprimands anti-GMO foodie Mark Bittman for “journalistic sloppiness” and “negligence” in his “[inability] to find reliable sources.”<\/p>\n

Furthermore, in a damning expos\u00e9, Jon Entine reveals that Michael Pollan, a food activist and frequent NYT<\/em> contributor, “has a history of promoting discredited studies and alarmist claims about GMOs.” Even worse, Mr. Entine writes that Mr. Pollan “candidly says he manipulated the credulous editors at the New York Times<\/em>… by presenting only one side of food and agriculture stories.” Mr. Pollan was also chided by plant scientist Steve Savage for disseminating inaccurate information on potato agriculture and fearmongering about McDonald’s French fries.<\/p>\n

On many matters concerning nutrition or health, the NYT<\/em> endorses the unscientific side of the debate. For instance, The Atlantic<\/em> criticized a New York Times Magazine<\/em> essay on the supposed toxicity of sugar. At Science 2.0<\/em>, Hank Campbell mocked an NYT<\/em> writer’s endorsement of gluten-free diets, and chemist Josh Bloom dismantled a painfully inaccurate editorial on painkillers.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Alex B. Berezow makes a case for the venerable New York Times to not cover science stories: What has gone so wrong for the NYT? Many things are to blame. The paper’s leftish editorial page is out of step with a large portion of the American public. A high-profile scandal, in which journalist Jayson Blair […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,16],"tags":[827,39,213],"class_list":["post-30854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-science","tag-genetics","tag-junkscience","tag-newspapers"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-81E","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30854"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30854\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30855,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30854\/revisions\/30855"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}