{"id":30470,"date":"2015-03-01T04:00:28","date_gmt":"2015-03-01T09:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=30470"},"modified":"2022-03-30T13:24:22","modified_gmt":"2022-03-30T17:24:22","slug":"the-f-35-will-cost-more-than-the-manhattan-project-every-year-for-the-next-fifty-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2015\/03\/01\/the-f-35-will-cost-more-than-the-manhattan-project-every-year-for-the-next-fifty-years\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;The F-35 will cost more than the Manhattan Project every year for the next fifty years&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2015\/02\/25\/dear-gop-big-governments-problems-extend-to-defense-spending\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Scott Lincicome<\/a> would like to point out to the contending Republicans hoping to become the GOP&#8217;s presidential candidate that defence spending is not immune to the massive overspending problem common to big government:<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/F-35-on-display-853x568.jpg\" alt=\"F-35 on display\" width=\"853\" height=\"568\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-30471\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/F-35-on-display-853x568.jpg 853w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/F-35-on-display-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/F-35-on-display-480x320.jpg 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/F-35-on-display.jpg 998w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 853px) 100vw, 853px\" \/><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Over the next 20 months, a clown-car-full of Republican politicians will vie for their party\u2019s presidential nomination. As the candidates crisscross the nation, each will undoubtedly call for smarter, leaner, and (hopefully) smaller government. However, there is one government program that, despite being a paragon of government incompetence and mind-bending fiscal incontinence, will most likely be ignored by these champions of budgetary temperance: the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. In so doing, these Republicans will abandon their principles and continue a long, bipartisan tradition of perpetuating the broader problems with U.S. defense spending that the troubled jet symbolizes.<\/p>\n<p>During the Obama years, the Republican Party magically rediscovered its commitment \u2014 at least rhetorically \u2014 to limited government and fiscal sanity. Criticizing the graft, incompetence, and cost of boondoggles like the 2009 stimulus bill, green-energy subsidies, or Obamacare, GOP politicians not only highlighted these programs\u2019 specific failings, but also often explained how such problems were the inevitable result of an unwieldy federal government that lacked discipline and accountability and was inherently susceptible to capture by well-funded interest groups like unions or insurance companies.<\/p>\n<p>They railed against massive bureaucracies, like the Department of Energy, that paid off cronies with scant congressional oversight. And, in the case of well-publicized debacles like the botched, billion-dollar Healthcare.gov roll-out, many Republicans were quick to note that the root of the problem lay not in one glitchy website, but the entire federal <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/2080320\/outdated-it-contracting-rules-added-to-healthcaregov-woes.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">procurement process<\/a>, and even Big Government itself<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>One wonders, however, if these Republicans\u2019 philosophical understanding of Big Government\u2019s inherent weaknesses extends to national defense and, in particular, the F-35. According to the <a href=\"http:\/\/mobile.reuters.com\/article\/idUSBRE82S03L20120329?irpc=932\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">latest (2012) estimate<\/a> from the Pentagon, the total cost to develop, buy and operate the F-35 will be $1.45 trillion \u2014 yes, <em>trillion<\/em>, with a \u201ct\u201d \u2014 over the next 50 years, up from a measly $1 trillion estimated in 2011. For those of you keeping score at home, this means that the F-35\u2019s lifetime cost grew about $450 billion in one year. (Who says inflation is dead?)<\/p>\n<p>That number \u2014 $1.45 trillion \u2014 might be difficult to grasp, especially in the context of U.S. defense spending, so let me try to put it in perspective: the entire <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Manhattan_Project\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Manhattan Project<\/a>, which took around three years and led to the development of the atom bomb, cost a total of $26 billion (2015), most of which went to \u201cbuilding factories and producing the fissile materials, with less than 10% for development and production of the weapons.\u201d By contrast, the F-35 will cost $29 <em>billion<\/em>. Per year.<\/p>\n<p>For the next 50 years.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Scott Lincicome would like to point out to the contending Republicans hoping to become the GOP&#8217;s presidential candidate that defence spending is not immune to the massive overspending problem common to big government: Over the next 20 months, a clown-car-full of Republican politicians will vie for their party\u2019s presidential nomination. As the candidates crisscross the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,84,5,13],"tags":[145,697,727,559,1463,517],"class_list":["post-30470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bureaucracy","category-government","category-military","category-usa","tag-airforce","tag-budget","tag-cronycapitalism","tag-f-35","tag-militaryprocurement","tag-republican"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-7Vs","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30470"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30470\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72687,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30470\/revisions\/72687"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}