{"id":28673,"date":"2014-11-14T07:24:22","date_gmt":"2014-11-14T12:24:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=28673"},"modified":"2014-11-28T15:07:52","modified_gmt":"2014-11-28T20:07:52","slug":"either-kink-is-now-pretty-much-mainstream-or-quebec-is-a-hotbed-of-kinksters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2014\/11\/14\/either-kink-is-now-pretty-much-mainstream-or-quebec-is-a-hotbed-of-kinksters\/","title":{"rendered":"Either kink is now pretty much mainstream &#8230; or Quebec is a hotbed of kinksters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <em>Reason<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/reason.com\/blog\/2014\/11\/11\/kinky-sex-survey-finds-everybodys-weird\" target=\"_blank\">Elizabeth Nolan Brown<\/a> reviews the findings of a recent survey on what kind of kinks are no longer considered weird or unusual (because so many people fantasize about &#8217;em or are actively partaking of &#8217;em):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Being sexually dominated. Having sex with multiple people at once. Watching someone undress without their knowledge. These are just a few of the totally <em>normal<\/em> sexual fantasies uncovered by recent research published in the <em>Journal of Sexual Medicine<\/em>. The overarching takeaway from this survey of about 1,500 Canadian adults is that sexual kink is incredibly common. <\/p>\n<p>While plenty of research has been conducted on sexual fetishes, less is known about the prevalence of particular sexual desires that don&#8217;t rise to the level of pathological (i.e., don&#8217;t harm others or interfere with normal life functioning and aren&#8217;t a requisite for getting off). &#8220;Our main objective was to specify norms in sexual fantasies,&#8221; said lead study author Christian Joyal. &#8220;We suspected there are a lot more common fantasies than atypical fantasies.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Joyal&#8217;s team surveyed about 717 Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois men and 799 women, with a mean age of 30. Participants ranked 55 different sexual fantasies, as well as wrote in their own. Each fantasy was then rated as statistically rare, unusual, common, or typical. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Of course, the statistics also show where men and women differ in some areas:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Notably, men were more likely than women to say they wanted their sexual fantasies to become sexual realities. &#8220;Approximately half of women with descriptions of submissive fantasies speci\ufb01ed that they would not want the fantasy to materialize in real life,&#8221; the researchers note. &#8220;This result con\ufb01rms the important distinction between sexual fantasies and sexual wishes, which is usually stronger among women than among men.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>The researchers also found a number of write-in &#8220;favorite&#8221; sexual fantasies that were common among men had no equivalent in women&#8217;s fantasies. These included having sex with a trans woman (included in 4.2 percent of write-in fantasies), being on the receiving end of strap-on\/non-homosexual anal sex (6.1 percent), and watching a partner have sex with another man (8.4 percent).<\/p>\n<p>Next up, the researchers plan to map subgroups of sexual fantasies that often go together (for instance, those who reported submissive fantasies were also more likely to report domination fantasies, and both were associated with higher levels of overall sexual satisfaction). For now, they caution that &#8220;care should be taken before labeling (a sexual fantasy) as unusual, let alone deviant.&#8221; <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It would be interesting to see the results of this study replicated in other areas &mdash; Quebec may or may not be representative of the rest of western society.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Update, 28 November<\/strong>: <a href=\"http:\/\/maggiemcneill.wordpress.com\/2014\/11\/17\/skewed-by-taboo\/\" target=\"_blank\">Maggie McNeill<\/a> is not impressed by the study at all.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But there\u2019s a bigger problem, which as it turns out I\u2019ve written on before when the titillation <em>du jour<\/em> was the claim that fewer men were paying for sex:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<p><em>\u2026 the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/General_Social_Survey\" target=\"_blank\">General Social Survey<\/a> \u2026 has one huge, massive flaw that was mentioned by my psychology professors way back in the Dark Ages of the 1980s, yet seems not to trouble those who rely upon it so heavily these days: it is conducted in person, face to face with the respondents. And that means that on sensitive topics carrying criminal penalties or heavy social stigma, the results are less than solid; negative opinions of its dependability on such matters range from \u201cunreliable\u201d to \u201cuseless\u201d. The fact of the matter is that human beings want to look good to authority figures (like sociologists in white lab coats) even when they don\u2019t know them from Adam, so they tend to deviate from strict veracity toward whatever answer they think the interviewer wants to hear\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.inquisitr.com\/1579428\/researchers-analyzed-sexual-fantasies-only-two-found-to-be-rare-nine-found-to-be-unusual\/\" target=\"_blank\">So, what does this study say constitutes an \u201cabnormal\u201d fantasy?<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<p><em>\u201cClinically, we know what pathological sexual fantasies are: they involve non-consenting partners, they induce pain, or they are absolutely necessary in deriving satisfaction,\u201d Christian Joyal, the lead author of the study, said\u2026The researchers found that only two sexual fantasies were\u2026rare:  Sexual activities with a child or an animal\u2026only nine sexual fantasies were considered unusual\u2026[including] \u201cgolden showers,\u201d cross-dressing, [and] sex with a prostitute\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Joyal\u2019s claim that sadistic and rape fantasies are innately \u201cpathological\u201d is both insulting and totally wrong; we \u201cknow\u201d no such thing. And did you think it was a coincidence that pedophilia and bestiality were the only two fantasies to fall into the \u201crare\u201d category during a time when those are the two most vilified kinks in the catalog, kinks which will result in permanent consignment to pariah status if discovered? Guess again; as recently as the 1980s it was acceptable to at least talk about both of these, and neither is as rare as this \u201cstudy\u201d pretends. But Man is a social animal, and even if someone is <em>absolutely certain<\/em> of his anonymity (which in the post-Snowden era would be a much rarer thing than either of those fantasies), few are willing to risk the disapproval of a lab-coated authority figure even if he <em>isn\u2019t<\/em> sitting directly in front of them. What this study shows is not how common these fantasies actually <em>are<\/em>, but rather how safe people feel admitting to them. And while that\u2019s an interesting thing in itself, it isn\u2019t what everyone from researchers to reporters to readers is pretending the study measured.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Reason, Elizabeth Nolan Brown reviews the findings of a recent survey on what kind of kinks are no longer considered weird or unusual (because so many people fantasize about &#8217;em or are actively partaking of &#8217;em): Being sexually dominated. Having sex with multiple people at once. Watching someone undress without their knowledge. These are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,66],"tags":[39,289,113,513,255,290],"class_list":["post-28673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-health-science","tag-junkscience","tag-polls","tag-quebec","tag-research","tag-sexuality","tag-statistics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-7st","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28673"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28673\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28937,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28673\/revisions\/28937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}