{"id":28527,"date":"2014-11-04T00:02:05","date_gmt":"2014-11-04T05:02:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=28527"},"modified":"2014-11-02T18:41:56","modified_gmt":"2014-11-02T23:41:56","slug":"vizzini-and-the-man-in-black-different-kinds-of-planners","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2014\/11\/04\/vizzini-and-the-man-in-black-different-kinds-of-planners\/","title":{"rendered":"Vizzini and the Man in Black – different kinds of planners"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sarah Skwire<\/a> on the two different types of planners featured in William Goldman’s novel The Princess Bride<\/em>:<\/p>\n

… in the response that has spawned an M.O.U.T. (meme of unusual tenacity<\/a>), Inigo replies, \u201cYou keep using that word! \u2026 I don’t think it means what you think it does.”<\/p>\n

When my friend Sam Wilson, a frequent blogger at both Euvoluntary Exchange<\/em> and Sweet Talk<\/em>, posted a brief Facebook comment on that famous line, a glorious debate erupted. Sam recorded a bit of that over at Sweet Talk<\/em>, but since that same discussion got me thinking about The Princess Bride<\/em> in light of questions of political economy, I thought it was worth bringing over here.<\/p>\n

Throughout the novel, Vizzini stands as an example of the expert, the intellectual, and the man of system. Thoroughly persuaded that he is capable of controlling the innumerable variables that are involved in every step of his extraordinarily complicated plans, he is constantly failing. While his initial snatch-and-grab of Buttercup goes well enough, everything after that begins to collapse \u2014 and always because he has failed to anticipate some kind of human action.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

After a few rounds of intellectual pyrotechnics designed to determine the location of the poison, Vizzini fails. And he dies. And the reason Vizzini fails is that, once more, he has not anticipated a human action. The Man in Black has poisoned both cups. The Man in Black has conditioned himself to be immune to this poison, on the off chance that an occasion like this should arise. Once again, Vizzini\u2019s ideal plan has been beaten by unpredictable humans.<\/p>\n

I can hear Sam objecting that our hero, the Man in Black, is also something of a planner. I point out, in response, that his plans \u2014 particularly the plan to storm the wedding and rescue Buttercup \u2014 are always flexible, updated on the fly, and tagged with a warning label reading, \u201cHear me now; there may be problems once we’re inside.” He is a planner, yes, but certainly not one who believes his plans are ideal and immune to failure. It seems likely that the Man in Black has read Hayek\u2019s \u201cUse of Knowledge in Society,\u201d which emphasizes the importance and viability of this kind of \u201cknowledge of people, of local conditions, and of special circumstances\u201d that allow an individual to plan his own actions and respond speedily when circumstances change.<\/p>\n

By contrast, Vizzini might have done well to read Hayek\u2019s \u201cThe Intellectuals and Socialism,\u201d which could have cautioned him about the dangers of viewing the world only through one theoretical lens and ignoring the advice of practical types like Inigo. He certainly would have profited from Adam Smith\u2019s famous warnings about the man of system, who treats other human beings as if they are merely chess pieces, with no motivations of their own. It is those motivations that thwart Vizzini at every turn. His human design is beaten, every time, by the unpredicted and unpredictable human actions of others.<\/p>\n

As Hayek and Smith and a host of other thinkers remind us, any other outcome is simply inconceivable.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sarah Skwire on the two different types of planners featured in William Goldman’s novel The Princess Bride: … in the response that has spawned an M.O.U.T. (meme of unusual tenacity), Inigo replies, \u201cYou keep using that word! \u2026 I don’t think it means what you think it does.” When my friend Sam Wilson, a frequent […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,57,28],"tags":[712],"class_list":["post-28527","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-humour","category-media","tag-centralplanning"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-7q7","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28527"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28527\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28528,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28527\/revisions\/28528"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}