{"id":27883,"date":"2014-09-18T10:16:12","date_gmt":"2014-09-18T14:16:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=27883"},"modified":"2014-09-18T10:16:12","modified_gmt":"2014-09-18T14:16:12","slug":"if-rush-limbaugh-didnt-exist-the-left-would-have-to-invent-him","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2014\/09\/18\/if-rush-limbaugh-didnt-exist-the-left-would-have-to-invent-him\/","title":{"rendered":"If Rush Limbaugh didn’t exist, the left would have to invent him"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hans Bader<\/a> on how Rush Limbaugh is a constant gift to his enemies … almost a Rob Ford of US political commentary:<\/p>\n

Rush Limbaugh can take a winning issue for conservatives and turn it into a loser just by shooting his mouth off. He gives advocates of extreme left-wing policies ammunition for their views by making stupid arguments when smarter arguments exist, and by lacing his arguments with sexism or scurrilous remarks. He did it recently in response to my commentary about Ohio State University\u2019s ridiculously overbroad and intrusive \u201csexual assault\u201d definition \u2014 which seemingly requires students to agree on \u201cwhy\u201d they are having sex or making out, which is none of the university\u2019s business. And he did it in 2012, when his scurrilous remarks about contraceptive advocate Sandra Fluke being a \u201cslut\u201d and a \u201cprostitute\u201d drove even moderate liberals to support a contraceptive mandate on religious employers that they had earlier opposed (and which the Supreme Court later ruled 5-to-4 violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.)<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

But instead of focusing on that in his criticism of Ohio State\u2019s policy, Limbaugh changed the subject to asking whether \u201cno\u201d really means \u201cno,\u201d saying \u201cHow many of you guys in your own experience with women have learned that no means yes, if you know how to spot it?\u201d He then temporarily backed away from this remark by saying, \u201cLet me tell you something, in this modern world, that\u2019s simply\u2026that\u2019s not tolerated.\u201d But then he returned to the inflammatory subject of \u201cno\u201d supposedly not meaning \u201cno\u201d by saying \u201cIt used to be that it was a clich\u00e9. It used to be part of the advice young boys were given.\u201d<\/p>\n

Liberal blogs like Think Progress<\/em>, and newspaper blogs had a field day making fun of his comments questioning whether no means no, and using them to imply that the only reason anybody would ever oppose requiring \u201caffirmative consent\u201d is because they are a misogynistic troll like Limbaugh. In response, a columnist at a major midwestern newspaper endorsed the policy as supposedly being \u201csmart\u201d in light of the need to educate people like Limbaugh about consent. (Never mind that Limbaugh is not a college student, and it\u2019s hard to imagine many college students sharing his ancient views.)<\/p>\n

As a result, all of my efforts were undone, by a factor of ten. Overnight, a policy that seemed extreme even to liberals I discussed it with became embraced by many liberal commenters at these blogs, partly out of a desire to spite the hateful Limbaugh. It is being used to depict critics of the extreme policy as themselves being extreme.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hans Bader on how Rush Limbaugh is a constant gift to his enemies … almost a Rob Ford of US political commentary: Rush Limbaugh can take a winning issue for conservatives and turn it into a loser just by shooting his mouth off. He gives advocates of extreme left-wing policies ammunition for their views by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,53,13],"tags":[431,86,156,795,255],"class_list":["post-27883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-politics","category-usa","tag-conservatism","tag-criticism","tag-fail","tag-radio","tag-sexuality"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-7fJ","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27883"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27883\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27884,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27883\/revisions\/27884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}