{"id":27116,"date":"2015-07-31T01:00:09","date_gmt":"2015-07-31T05:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=27116"},"modified":"2015-07-23T21:17:29","modified_gmt":"2015-07-24T01:17:29","slug":"qotd-having-it-all","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2015\/07\/31\/qotd-having-it-all\/","title":{"rendered":"QotD: “Having it all”"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 2012, Gloria Steinem complained that the Have It All question was a \u201cbullshit\u201d question because no one ever asked that question of men. It\u2019s true. Society doesn\u2019t often ask that question of men, but not because of sexism.<\/p>\n

Women ask about having it all because they were told they could have it all\u2026by women like Steinem. The old glossy women\u2019s magazines are full of have-it-all glamour, declaring that women could easily have it all without men. Steinem did not actually coin the \u201cA woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle\u201d quip, but she got the credit for it because it succinctly represented her preaching and the mood of the time. Women didn\u2019t need anything but the old rules and the old men to get out of their way. Each woman was an island unto herself, a self-contained unit of success. Eventually, all of those things we told women back in the 60s to boost their confidence and get them out in the world became the standard by which we now demand singular performance from women.<\/p>\n

Check the commentary in many of the lauded feminist pop culture franchises, most recently \u201cDivergent,\u201d \u201cFrozen,\u201d \u201cMaleficent,\u201d etc. Characters get the feminist seal of approval when they are separated from any sort of partnership with men. Having it all doesn\u2019t count unless we are doing it without men.<\/p>\n

Men, on the other hand, didn\u2019t have some masculinist movement telling them that they could have it all, much less that they had to do it all on their own. Nor would they have been as receptive if they had. Unlike girls who tend to engage in pretend play in which they are the princess, then the chef, then the teacher or the pupil, all in the space of an afternoon, boys tend to also play games with rules, even if they\u2019ve made them up by consensus. The boy who isn\u2019t fast learns to hit the ball harder or to catch. They train each other in tradeoffs. The rules don\u2019t bend. The boys adapt to the world the way it is. (I host large parties and play dates often. This plays out in my yard, every time.)<\/p>\n

Asking women if they can have it all isn\u2019t sexism. It is an aspiration that women who should know better foist upon women who don\u2019t.<\/p>\n

Leslie Loftis, “Irony, Thy Name Is Feminism”, The Federalist<\/em><\/a>, 2014-07-28.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In 2012, Gloria Steinem complained that the Have It All question was a \u201cbullshit\u201d question because no one ever asked that question of men. It\u2019s true. Society doesn\u2019t often ask that question of men, but not because of sexism. Women ask about having it all because they were told they could have it all\u2026by women […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,41],"tags":[374,987,303,43],"class_list":["post-27116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-quotations","tag-children","tag-feminism","tag-sexism","tag-women"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-73m","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27116"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27116\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27117,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27116\/revisions\/27117"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}