{"id":26634,"date":"2014-06-30T08:42:13","date_gmt":"2014-06-30T13:42:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=26634"},"modified":"2014-06-30T08:43:56","modified_gmt":"2014-06-30T13:43:56","slug":"has-your-facebook-feed-been-particularly-down-lately","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2014\/06\/30\/has-your-facebook-feed-been-particularly-down-lately\/","title":{"rendered":"Has your Facebook<\/em> feed been particularly “down” lately?"},"content":{"rendered":"

If so, you may have been involuntarily recruited to take part in a “scientific” study<\/a> as Facebook<\/em> tailored hundreds of thousands of users’ feeds to show them only good news or only bad news:<\/p>\n

As you may have heard (since it appears to have become the hyped up internet story of the weekend), the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em> (PNAS) recently published a study done by Facebook<\/em>, with an assist from researchers at UCSF and Cornell, in which they directly tried (and apparently succeeded) to manipulate the emotions of 689,003 users of Facebook<\/em> for a week. The participants — without realizing they were a part of the study — had their news feeds “manipulated” so that they showed all good news or all bad news. The idea was to see if this made the users themselves feel good or bad. Contradicting some other research which found that looking at photos of your happy friends made you sad, this research apparently found that happy stuff in your feed makes you happy. But, what’s got a lot of people up in arms is the other side of that coin: seeing a lot of negative stories in your feed, appears to make people mad.<\/p>\n

There are, of course, many different ways to view this: and the immediate response from many is “damn, that’s creepy.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Did you know that your terms of service with Facebook<\/em> allow this? I suspect a lot of Facebook<\/em> users had no clue that their newsfeeds could be (and regularly are) manipulated without their awareness and consent.<\/p>\n

If anything, what I think this does is really to highlight<\/em> how much Facebook<\/em> manipulates the newsfeed. This is something very few people seem to think about or consider. Facebook<\/em>‘s newsfeed system has always been something of a black box (which is a reason that I prefer Twitter<\/em>‘s setup where you get the self-chosen firehose, rather than some algorithm (or researchers’ decisions) picking what I get to see). And, thus, in the end, while Facebook<\/em> may have failed to get the level of “informed consent” necessary for such a study, it may have, in turn, done a much better job accidentally “informing” a lot more people how its newsfeeds get manipulated. Whether or not that leads more people to rely on Facebook<\/em> less, well, perhaps that will be the subject of a future study…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Related: Brendan posted this the other day, and I found it quite amusing.<\/p>\n