{"id":26473,"date":"2014-06-24T11:53:02","date_gmt":"2014-06-24T16:53:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=26473"},"modified":"2014-06-24T11:53:02","modified_gmt":"2014-06-24T16:53:02","slug":"fairtrade-loses-the-moral-high-ground","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2014\/06\/24\/fairtrade-loses-the-moral-high-ground\/","title":{"rendered":"Fairtrade loses the moral high ground"},"content":{"rendered":"

Following up on an article from earlier this month<\/a> on Fairtrade’s business and ethical problems, Rossa Minogue<\/a> talks to Professor Christopher Cramer who lead the investigation on which the report was based:<\/p>\n

I ask Cramer if he was surprised by the study\u2019s findings. \u2018Yes and no\u2019, he says. \u2018[Fairtrade] perpetuated this fantasy of rural Africa being full of small, family farmers with roughly the same amount of land as each other. Unless there was an extraordinarily benign trickle-down effect, you wouldn\u2019t really expect things to be much better [on Fairtrade farms]. But to find that the wages were worse and that most of the working conditions were worse, that did surprise me — and it\u2019s a puzzle.\u2019<\/p>\n

The study\u2019s findings were certainly disconcerting for Fairtrade\u2019s supporters. They showed that farm labourers often make less on Fairtrade farms than non-Fairtrade farms, while many smallholders live in abject poverty. So, does Fairtrade benefit anyone in Third World agriculture? Cramer tells me that, during his four years of field research, his team realised that what Fairtrade defined as \u2018smallholders\u2019 covered everything from owners of farms of half a hectare to 130 hectares. The owners of bigger farms, he tells me, \u2018are the ones who capture most of the direct benefits. They also tend to control the leadership of the cooperatives.\u2019 So it seems that the larger farms, the ones that would presumably be doing alright anyway, are the only ones that reap the rewards of Fairtrade — a programme allegedly aimed at helping the poorest of the poor.<\/p>\n

Cramer\u2019s report is definitely a damning indictment of Fairtrade, which is why Fairtrade is doing all it can to smear its findings. When I wrote about Cramer\u2019s findings a few weeks ago, I was informed that people who had tweeted my piece received direct tweets from Fairtrade UK, dismissing the article as sensationalist and untrue. Naturally, Cramer has borne the brunt of this hostility: \u2018There was a legal threat made against us when [Fairtrade officials] saw the first draft of our press release\u2019, he says. \u2018They\u2019ve also sent me hostile letters.\u2019 <\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

In the West, people are often puzzled as to why rural Africans give up what is sometimes perceived to be a poor but idyllic existence in the countryside to live in the slums on the outskirts of cities. However, this puzzlement ignores the harsh realities of rural poverty. For many, moving to the city, where they can at least eke out a living, is the only rational choice. So what is the best path out of poverty for the farmhands of Africa?<\/p>\n

\u2018That\u2019s a big question. The focus must be on increasing agricultural productivity and that involves a lot of things, including infrastructure and investment. I don\u2019t buy into the small-is-beautiful paradigm. My research shows that if you\u2019re interested in driving up quality and enhancing productivity, as well as the lives and prospects of the poorest people, large-scale production has its advantages. Betting on the strong can also be betting on the weak.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Following up on an article from earlier this month on Fairtrade’s business and ethical problems, Rossa Minogue talks to Professor Christopher Cramer who lead the investigation on which the report was based: I ask Cramer if he was surprised by the study\u2019s findings. \u2018Yes and no\u2019, he says. \u2018[Fairtrade] perpetuated this fantasy of rural Africa […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[362,831,28],"tags":[271,91],"class_list":["post-26473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-africa","category-business","category-media","tag-ethics","tag-poverty"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-6SZ","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26473"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26473\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26474,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26473\/revisions\/26474"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}