{"id":25311,"date":"2014-04-25T08:32:31","date_gmt":"2014-04-25T13:32:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=25311"},"modified":"2014-04-25T08:37:43","modified_gmt":"2014-04-25T13:37:43","slug":"is-it-science-or-science-a-cheat-sheet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2014\/04\/25\/is-it-science-or-science-a-cheat-sheet\/","title":{"rendered":"Is it science or “science”? A cheat sheet"},"content":{"rendered":"

At Lifehacker<\/em>, Alan Henry<\/a> links to this useful infographic:<\/p>\n

\"Click<\/a>

Click to see full-size image at Compound Interest<\/p><\/div><\/p>\n

Science is amazing, but science reporting can be confusing at times and misleading at worst. The folks at Compound Interest<\/em> put together this reference graphic that will help you pick out good articles from bad ones, and help you qualify the impact of the study you’re reading<\/p>\n

One of the best and worst things about having a scientific background is being able to see when a science story is poorly reported, or a preliminary study published as if it were otherwise. One of the worst things about writing about science worrying you’ll fall into the same trap. It’s a constant struggle, because there are interesting takeaways even from preliminary studies and small sample sizes, but it’s important to qualify them as such so you don’t misrepresent the research. With this guide, you’ll be able to see when a study’s results are interesting food for thought that’s still developing, versus a relatively solid position that has consensus behind it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

At Lifehacker, Alan Henry links to this useful infographic: Science is amazing, but science reporting can be confusing at times and misleading at worst. The folks at Compound Interest put together this reference graphic that will help you pick out good articles from bad ones, and help you qualify the impact of the study you’re […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,16],"tags":[58,39,477,213,810,101],"class_list":["post-25311","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-science","tag-internet","tag-junkscience","tag-magazines","tag-newspapers","tag-skepticism","tag-tv"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-6Af","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25311"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25311\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25313,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25311\/revisions\/25313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}