{"id":24689,"date":"2014-03-16T09:49:39","date_gmt":"2014-03-16T14:49:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=24689"},"modified":"2014-03-16T09:49:39","modified_gmt":"2014-03-16T14:49:39","slug":"defining-hackers-and-hacker-culture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2014\/03\/16\/defining-hackers-and-hacker-culture\/","title":{"rendered":"Defining hackers and hacker culture"},"content":{"rendered":"

ESR<\/a> put this together as a backgrounder for a documentary film maker:<\/p>\n

In its original and still most correct sense, the word \u201chacker\u201d describes a member of a tribe of expert and playful programmers with roots in 1960s and 1970s computer-science academia, the early microcomputer experimenters, and several other contributory cultures including science-fiction fandom.<\/p>\n

Through a historical process I could explain in as much detail as you like, this hacker culture became the architects of today\u2019s Internet and evolved into the open-source software movement. (I had a significant role in this process as historian and activist, which is why my friends recommended that you talk to me.)<\/p>\n

People outside this culture sometimes refer to it as \u201cold-school hackers\u201d or \u201cwhite-hat hackers\u201d (the latter term also has some more specific shades of meaning). People inside it (including me) insist that we are just \u201chackers\u201d and using that term for anyone else is misleading and disrespectful.<\/p>\n

Within this culture, \u201chacker\u201d applied to an individual is understood to be a title of honor which it is arrogant to claim for yourself. It has to be conferred by people who are already insiders. You earn it by building things, by a combination of work and cleverness and the right attitude. Nowadays \u201cbuilding things\u201d centers on open-source software and hardware, and on the support services for open-source projects.<\/p>\n

There are — seriously — people in the hacker culture who refuse to describe themselves individually<\/em> as hackers because they think they haven\u2019t earned the title yet — they haven\u2019t built enough stuff. One of the social functions of tribal elders like myself is to be seen to be conferring the title, a certification that is taken quite seriously; it\u2019s like being knighted.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

There is a cluster of geek subcultures within which the term \u201chacker\u201d has very high prestige. If you think about my earlier description it should be clear why. Building stuff is cool, it\u2019s an achievement.<\/p>\n

There is a tendency for members of those other subcultures to try to appropriate hacker status for themselves, and to emulate various hacker behaviors — sometimes superficially, sometimes deeply and genuinely.<\/p>\n

Imitative behavior creates a sort of gray zone around the hacker culture proper. Some people in that zone are mere posers. Some are genuinely trying to act out hacker values as they (incompletely) understand them. Some are \u2018hacktivists\u2019 with Internet-related political agendas but who don\u2019t write code. Some are outright criminals exploiting journalistic confusion about what \u201chacker\u201d means. Some are ambiguous mixtures of several of these types.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ESR put this together as a backgrounder for a documentary film maker: In its original and still most correct sense, the word \u201chacker\u201d describes a member of a tribe of expert and playful programmers with roots in 1960s and 1970s computer-science academia, the early microcomputer experimenters, and several other contributory cultures including science-fiction fandom. Through […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,15],"tags":[109,262,129,58],"class_list":["post-24689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-technology","tag-computers","tag-culture","tag-hack","tag-internet"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-6qd","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24689"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24689\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24690,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24689\/revisions\/24690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}