{"id":23529,"date":"2014-01-03T10:08:18","date_gmt":"2014-01-03T15:08:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=23529"},"modified":"2014-01-03T10:09:50","modified_gmt":"2014-01-03T15:09:50","slug":"its-time-to-say-goodbye-to-strong-female-characters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2014\/01\/03\/its-time-to-say-goodbye-to-strong-female-characters\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s time to say goodbye to &#8220;strong female characters&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No, I don&#8217;t mean get rid of strong characters &#8230; but lets move on from the <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.indiewire.com\/womenandhollywood\/goodbye-to-strong-female-characters\" target=\"_blank\">patronizingly token &#8220;strong&#8221; female character<\/a> who is just <strong>physically<\/strong> strong:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230; Hollywood has taken our love of strong female characters and converted it into something dully literal. Strong female characters have become Strong Female Characters, a mutant sub-genus that has less to do with actual women than T-Rexes: physically intimidating, but mentally nonthreatening. But muscle strength isn&#8217;t all that interesting on its own &mdash; otherwise, Sylvester Stallone and Jean-Claude Van Damme would be where George Clooney and Brad Pitt are on the Hollywood A-list. As Sophia McDougall argued this summer in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newstatesman.com\/culture\/2013\/08\/i-hate-strong-female-characters\" target=\"_blank\">pop culture feminist critique of the year<\/a>, strength is too often a substitute for personality where female characters are concerned. <\/p>\n<p>The Mary Sue <a href=\"http:\/\/www.themarysue.com\/gaiman-strong-female-characters\/\" target=\"_blank\">points out<\/a> in yet an interview with Neil Gaiman about &mdash; you guessed it, &#8220;Strong Female Characters,&#8221; because he and Joss Whedon are apparently the world&#8217;s only authorities on writing interesting women &mdash; that &#8220;strong female characters don&#8217;t necessarily have to have Hulk strength, they need to be strongly written.&#8221; Well, sure, we all want female characters to be strongly written, but the problem is no one knows exactly what that means anymore.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Like the Bechdel test, the &#8220;female characters with agency&#8221; solution is an imperfect one. But we humans really enjoy our one-stop solutions and easy fixes, and <strong>plot-driving female characters<\/strong> is the one we need right now. Because the problem with the representation of women on screen isn&#8217;t just that there are <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.indiewire.com\/womenandhollywood\/geena-davis-we-are-enculturating-kids-to-see-women-and-girls-as-not-taking-up-half-the-space\" target=\"_blank\">almost five times as many male characters as there are female ones<\/a>, but also that the relatively few women characters who do appear are constantly reduced to roles of passivity and, thus, inconsequentiality. <\/p>\n<p>Female characters don&#8217;t always have to win, but we&#8217;d like to at least see them try. The time has passed when we are satisfied with a woman character holding a gun or kicking butt as a cheap, insincere nod toward equality. We&#8217;re done with strength. Now we want to see the struggles. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>H\/T to <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/elixabethclaire\/\" target=\"_blank\">@Elisabeth<\/a> for the link.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No, I don&#8217;t mean get rid of strong characters &#8230; but lets move on from the patronizingly token &#8220;strong&#8221; female character who is just physically strong: &#8230; Hollywood has taken our love of strong female characters and converted it into something dully literal. Strong female characters have become Strong Female Characters, a mutant sub-genus that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,28],"tags":[939,122,101,43],"class_list":["post-23529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-media","tag-bechdeltest","tag-movies","tag-tv","tag-women"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-67v","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23529"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23529\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23532,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23529\/revisions\/23532"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}