{"id":22090,"date":"2013-09-12T10:58:28","date_gmt":"2013-09-12T15:58:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=22090"},"modified":"2013-09-12T11:00:41","modified_gmt":"2013-09-12T16:00:41","slug":"american-voters-suddenly-decide-to-take-a-serious-look-at-foreign-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2013\/09\/12\/american-voters-suddenly-decide-to-take-a-serious-look-at-foreign-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"American voters suddenly decide to take a serious look at foreign policy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A guest post at <em>Zero Hedge<\/em> by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/news\/2013-09-11\/guest-post-american-publics-foreign-policy-reawakening\" target=\"_blank\">Robery W. Merry<\/a> suggests that somnolent American interest in foreign policy may be waking up:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Political analysts over the next year or so, and historians well into the future, are likely to point to the fall of 2013 as a fundamental inflection point in American politics. That period, they will say, is when the American people forced a major new direction in American foreign policy. Before the events of this fall, the country\u2019s electorate largely delegated foreign policy to its political elite \u2014 and largely supported that elite as it projected American military power with more abandon than the country had ever before seen. Even as the government steadfastly expanded the range of international problems that it said required U.S. military action, the electorate accepted that expanded international role and that increasingly promiscuous use of force.<\/p>\n<p>Those days are gone now. The American people conveyed emphatically, in public opinion surveys and in communications to their representatives in Washington, that they did not want their country to launch air strikes against the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria. Not even if Assad used chemical weapons against his people, as they generally believe he did. Not even if the strikes are limited in magnitude and duration, as Obama promises they will be. Not even if the president of the United States says the strikes are in the country\u2019s national interest. They don\u2019t buy it, and they don\u2019t want it.<\/p>\n<p>Poll numbers in recent days have demonstrated this turnaround in stark fashion. In addition, congressional reluctance to support the president\u2019s authorization request was growing inexorably. <em>The New York Times<\/em> reported Tuesday that the president was &#8220;losing ground in both parties in recent days,&#8221; while the <em>Wall Street Journal<\/em> said support for Mr. Obama\u2019s position on Syria &#8220;was slipping in Congress.&#8221; If Russia\u2019s Vladimir Putin hadn\u2019t interrupted the U.S. political process with his call for a negotiated end to Assad\u2019s possession of chemical weapons, it seems inevitable that the president would have suffered a devastating political defeat in Congress. That\u2019s still the likely outcome if it ever comes to a vote.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>In a survey reported in Tuesday\u2019s <em>New York Times<\/em>, the paper asked broader questions about American foreign policy, and the results were revealing. Fully 62 percent of respondents said the United States shouldn\u2019t take a leading role in trying to solve foreign conflicts, while only 34 percent said it should. On a question whether the United States should intervene to turn dictatorships into democracies, 72 percent said no. Only 15 percent said yes. The <em>Times<\/em> said that represents the highest level of opposition recorded by the paper in various polls over the past decade.<\/p>\n<p>To understand the significance of these numbers, along with the political pressures building on lawmakers on the issue, it\u2019s important to note that American political sentiment doesn\u2019t change willy-nilly, for no reason. What we\u2019re seeing is the emergence within the American political consciousness of a sense that the country\u2019s national leaders have led it astray on foreign policy. And, given the country\u2019s foreign-policy history of the past two decades, it isn\u2019t surprising that the people would begin to nudge their leaders with a certain amount of agitation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A guest post at Zero Hedge by Robery W. Merry suggests that somnolent American interest in foreign policy may be waking up: Political analysts over the next year or so, and historians well into the future, are likely to point to the fall of 2013 as a fundamental inflection point in American politics. That period, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,53,13],"tags":[158,698,289,694],"class_list":["post-22090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-politics","category-usa","tag-barackobama","tag-congress","tag-polls","tag-syria"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-5Ki","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22090"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22090\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22092,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22090\/revisions\/22092"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}