{"id":21988,"date":"2013-09-05T09:37:02","date_gmt":"2013-09-05T13:37:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=21988"},"modified":"2022-03-30T13:33:17","modified_gmt":"2022-03-30T17:33:17","slug":"sea-king-replacement-program-branded-as-the-worst-in-canadas-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2013\/09\/05\/sea-king-replacement-program-branded-as-the-worst-in-canadas-history\/","title":{"rendered":"Sea King replacement program branded as “the worst in Canada’s history”"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"SeaThe Royal Canadian Navy is still operating the Sea King helicopter — which is 50 years old — and the planned replacement helicopters appear to be no closer to delivery<\/a> than they were 20 years ago:<\/p>\n

A naval helicopter procurement program described as the worst in Canada’s history was doomed from the start but could be made “viable and operationally relevant” if the federal government urgently adopts a new approach, says a confidential new report obtained by CBC News.<\/p>\n

The independent evaluation of the multibillion-dollar purchase of 28 CH-148 Cyclone helicopters to replace a 50-year-old fleet of Sea Kings<\/a>, obtained by CBC News Network’s Power & Politics<\/em> host Evan Solomon, concludes the government can get the problem-plagued program back on track by negotiating with primary supplier Sikorsky to “re-scope” the project’s structure, specifications and delivery approach.<\/p>\n

“[The] project could be viable and operationally relevant with a new structure and governance model as described in our recommendations,” reads the report from Hitachi Consulting.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

“A fundamental problem existed at the outset of this project \u2014 this set the stage for significant misalignment,” reads the key finding.<\/p>\n

The report says the government believed it was buying an “off-the-shelf” product by Sikorsky \u2014 a conclusion also drawn in a 2010 auditor general’s report<\/a>. Yet the project should have been treated as a development program because the “state-of-the-art” aircraft incorporates advanced technology and an in-service support capability “that is likely unsurpassed in the world today,” according to the report.<\/p>\n

While the fleet was to begin delivery in late 2008, so far only four of the Cyclone helicopters have been delivered \u2014 and only on an “interim” basis. The government won’t formally accept them because they don’t fully meet the specifications.<\/p>\n

Last year, then defence minister Peter MacKay cited the Sikorsky deal<\/a> as an example of how procurement can “go badly wrong.”<\/p>\n

“This is the worst procurement in the history of Canada, including the $500-million cancellation costs that are attached to the maritime helicopter program and then the costs of the further maintenance to fly the 50-year old helicopters,” he said at the time. “They’re going to go right out of aviation service and into the museum in Ottawa. And that’s not a joke.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

H\/T to Mark Collins<\/a> for the link.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Royal Canadian Navy is still operating the Sea King helicopter — which is 50 years old — and the planned replacement helicopters appear to be no closer to delivery than they were 20 years ago: A naval helicopter procurement program described as the worst in Canada’s history was doomed from the start but could […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,5],"tags":[565,1463,745],"class_list":["post-21988","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-military","tag-helicopters","tag-militaryprocurement","tag-rcn"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-5IE","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21988","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21988"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21988\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72698,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21988\/revisions\/72698"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21988"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21988"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21988"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}