{"id":21159,"date":"2013-07-18T08:14:28","date_gmt":"2013-07-18T12:14:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=21159"},"modified":"2018-08-10T15:36:44","modified_gmt":"2018-08-10T19:36:44","slug":"the-cost-of-withdrawal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2013\/07\/18\/the-cost-of-withdrawal\/","title":{"rendered":"The cost of withdrawal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of days ago, I posted an item on the <a href=\"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2013\/07\/15\/expensive-military-gear-to-become-piles-of-scrap\/\" target=\"_blank\">costs of removing military equipment<\/a> from Afghanistan (that is, due to lack of direct port access, thousands of tons of gear have to be flown out at an eye-watering $14,000 per ton). The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/world\/national-security\/flow-of-us-military-gear-across-afghan-borders-halts-amid-dispute\/2013\/07\/17\/3c1fa7cc-ef07-11e2-bed3-b9b6fe264871_story.html\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Washington Post<\/em><\/a> had an article yesterday discussing the <em>customs<\/em> dispute between the US military and the Afghan government which is making the situation even more fraught:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>An escalating dispute between the Afghan government and the United States over customs procedures has halted the flow of U.S. military equipment across Afghanistan\u2019s borders, forcing commanders to rely more heavily on air transport, which has dramatically increased the cost of the drawdown, according to military officials.<\/p>\n<p>The Afghan government is demanding that the U.S. military pay $1,000 for each shipping container leaving the country that does not have a corresponding, validated customs form. The country\u2019s customs agency says the American military has racked up $70 million in fines. <\/p>\n<p>If left unresolved, the disagreement could inflate the price tag of the U.S. military drawdown by hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars because of the higher cost of shipping by air \u2014 an unwelcome expenditure at a time when the Pentagon is scrambling to cope with steep congressionally mandated budget cuts and the White House is attempting to jump-start negotiations over a long-term security cooperation deal with Kabul.<\/p>\n<p>The Afghan government\u2019s demand for payment is part of a broader dispute over Kabul\u2019s authority to tax entities from the United States, its chief benefactor. As the war economy that for years bankrolled Afghanistan\u2019s political elite starts to deflate, the government is increasingly insisting that U.S. defense contractors pay business taxes and fines for a range of alleged violations. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>H\/T to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.outsidethebeltway.com\/afghans-want-to-charge-u-s-for-removing-military-gear\/\" target=\"_blank\">Doug Mataconis<\/a> who also wrote:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We invaded Afghanistan, arguably liberating them from the grip of the Taliban and their al Qaeda allies. We\u2019ve spent ten years or so fighting to protect the government of Hamid Karzai from those same forces. And now they want to charge us to leave? Surely, this is a first, isn\u2019t it? On the other hand, I can see a benefit here. If we knew going into a war that we\u2019d have to pay money to get out at the end perhaps we\u2019d be less willing to start it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of days ago, I posted an item on the costs of removing military equipment from Afghanistan (that is, due to lack of direct port access, thousands of tons of gear have to be flown out at an eye-watering $14,000 per ton). The Washington Post had an article yesterday discussing the customs dispute between [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,13],"tags":[218,31,316,1066],"class_list":["post-21159","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-military","category-usa","tag-afghanistan","tag-army","tag-borders","tag-logistics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-5vh","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21159"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21159\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42342,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21159\/revisions\/42342"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}