{"id":20713,"date":"2013-06-17T09:06:56","date_gmt":"2013-06-17T14:06:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=20713"},"modified":"2013-06-17T09:06:56","modified_gmt":"2013-06-17T14:06:56","slug":"orwell-huxley-and-the-world-were-in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2013\/06\/17\/orwell-huxley-and-the-world-were-in\/","title":{"rendered":"Orwell, Huxley, and the world we&#8217;re in"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <em>Salon<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/2013\/06\/16\/from_ike_to_the_matrix_welcome_to_the_american_dystopia\/\" target=\"_blank\">Andrew O&#8217;Hehir<\/a> considers the separate strains of George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, and Philip K. Dick that predicted the way we&#8217;d be:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In 1946, two years before writing <em>1984<\/em>, Orwell wrote an essay about the new form of social organization he saw on the horizon. He predicted it would do away with private property, which didn\u2019t happen \u2013 but if we suppose that his idea of private property meant individual autonomy and freedom from debt slavery, this starts to sound more familiar:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<p><em>These people will eliminate the old capitalist class, crush the working class, and so organize society that all power and economic privilege remain in their own hands. Private property rights will be abolished, but common ownership will not be established. The new \u201cmanagerial\u201d societies will not consist of a patchwork of small, independent states, but of great super-states grouped round the main industrial centres in Europe, Asia, and America. These super-states will fight among themselves for possession of the remaining uncaptured portions of the earth, but will probably be unable to conquer one another completely. Internally, each society will be hierarchical, with an aristocracy of talent at the top and a mass of semi-slaves at the bottom.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<p>That vision of the future, so much more sober than what we\u2019re used to calling \u201cOrwellian,\u201d sounds eerily like the world we actually live in (with a few doses of Ayn Rand thrown in). So far as we know, our Huxley-Orwell hybrid society emerged organically from the end of the Cold War, rather than resulting from an apocalypse or a grand plan. It\u2019s almost a case of life imitating art, as if Earth\u2019s rulers had selected the most effective elements from various dystopian visions and strategically blended them. But I\u2019m not sure we can blame all this on a secret meeting of the Bilderberg Group, or some Lee Atwater ad campaign. As in <em>The Matrix<\/em>, we chose the simulacrum of democracy and bumper stickers about \u201cfreedom\u201d instead of the real things. We chose to believe that our political leaders stood for something besides rival castes within the ruling elite, chose to believe that a regime of torture and secrecy and endless global warfare was a rational response to the tragedy of 9\/11. We still believe those things, but our dystopia is still messy, still incoherent, still incomplete. Which means, in theory, that it can still be undone.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Salon, Andrew O&#8217;Hehir considers the separate strains of George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, and Philip K. Dick that predicted the way we&#8217;d be: In 1946, two years before writing 1984, Orwell wrote an essay about the new form of social organization he saw on the horizon. He predicted it would do away with private property, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,84,28,53],"tags":[67,354,37],"class_list":["post-20713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-government","category-media","category-politics","tag-aynrand","tag-georgeorwell","tag-matrix"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-5o5","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20713"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20713\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20714,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20713\/revisions\/20714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}