{"id":20467,"date":"2013-05-29T10:01:47","date_gmt":"2013-05-29T15:01:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=20467"},"modified":"2013-05-29T10:03:04","modified_gmt":"2013-05-29T15:03:04","slug":"one-imagines-this-isnt-the-response-the-administration-was-expecting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2013\/05\/29\/one-imagines-this-isnt-the-response-the-administration-was-expecting\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;One imagines this isn&#8217;t the response the administration was expecting&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the <em>Wall Street Journal<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424127887324310104578511342029938144.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion\" target=\"_blank\">James Taranto<\/a> talks about the surprising recent uniformity of opinion among media outlets:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Hey, kids! What time is it? &#8220;TIME TO GO: HOLDER OK&#8217;D PRESS PROBE,&#8221; shouted the always subtle homepage of the <em>Puffington Host<\/em> last Thursday evening. It was in response to the news, broken by NBC, that Attorney General Eric Holder had participated in &#8220;discussions&#8221; about &#8220;a controversial search warrant for a <em>Fox News<\/em> reporter&#8217;s private emails.&#8221; That&#8217;s in contrast with the Associated Press phone-log subpoena case, from which Holder told Congress he had recused himself.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>New York Times<\/em>&#8216;s reaction, while not as breathless, was more dramatic. The paper&#8217;s editorial appeared a week ago tomorrow &mdash; before Holder&#8217;s involvement had publicly emerged &mdash; under the headline &#8220;Another Chilling Leak Investigation.&#8221; The editorial was straightforward and reasonably argued. That may not sound like a great compliment, but this is the <em>New York Times<\/em> editorial page we&#8217;re talking about.<\/p>\n<p>The editorial was remarkable as much for what it didn&#8217;t say as for what it did. There were no snide asides about <em>Fox News<\/em>, or qualifications along the lines that &#8220;even Fox&#8221; has First Amendment rights. Nor did the <em>Times<\/em> editors take any shots at George W. Bush, congressional Republicans or any other familiar antagonist. They simply defended <em>Fox News<\/em>&#8216;s right to engage in news-gathering and denounced the Obama administration&#8217;s assault on it.<\/p>\n<p>One imagines this isn&#8217;t the response the administration was expecting.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the Wall Street Journal, James Taranto talks about the surprising recent uniformity of opinion among media outlets: Hey, kids! What time is it? &#8220;TIME TO GO: HOLDER OK&#8217;D PRESS PROBE,&#8221; shouted the always subtle homepage of the Puffington Host last Thursday evening. It was in response to the news, broken by NBC, that Attorney [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[84,10,28,13],"tags":[224,213,154,101],"class_list":["post-20467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government","category-liberty","category-media","category-usa","tag-freedomofthepress","tag-newspapers","tag-privacy","tag-tv"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-5k7","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20467"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20467\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20469,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20467\/revisions\/20469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}