{"id":20020,"date":"2013-04-28T09:18:55","date_gmt":"2013-04-28T14:18:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=20020"},"modified":"2013-04-28T09:18:55","modified_gmt":"2013-04-28T14:18:55","slug":"the-first-sin-of-conservatism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2013\/04\/28\/the-first-sin-of-conservatism\/","title":{"rendered":"The &#8220;first sin of conservatism&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In yesterday&#8217;s Goldberg File email, Jonah Goldberg talked about making a speech at Washington College the night before:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>During the Q&#038;A a very attractive girl who&#8217;d spent much of my talk rolling her eyes and chatting with her friend, asked me a pretty typical question. She asked, more or less: How can you expect the Republicans to have a future if you go around antagonizing liberals, who are half the country, the way you did tonight?<\/p>\n<p>I responded with a few points. First, I did my &#8220;Babe Ruth pointing to the outfield.&#8221; Then I did &#8220;dog pointing at water fowl.&#8221; I followed up with &#8220;Billy Hayes furiously pointing at Rifki in <em>Midnight Express<\/em>.&#8221; And I closed with the crowd pleaser &#8220;Bill Clinton pointing out his nightly selections from the intern pens.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Once I was done with my interpretive dance &#8220;points,&#8221; I adjusted my form fitting unitard and made some verbal ones.<\/p>\n<p>I explained that I was not there as a Republican and that I don&#8217;t speak for the Republican party. The GOP is simply the more conservative of the two political parties and as such it gets my vote. I speak for myself, for conservatism as I understand it, and &mdash; it should go without saying &mdash; the riders of Rohan.<\/p>\n<p>Second, liberals &mdash; as in people who actually call themselves liberals &mdash; make up only about 20 percent of the electorate, while people who self-identify as conservatives make up 40 percent of the country. So even if I was speaking for Republicans, the idea that the key to Republican success lies in avoiding antagonizing liberals is just plain weird. Besides, liberals have had a great run of late antagonizing conservatives. Shouldn&#8217;t that mean liberals are doomed?<\/p>\n<p>I made a few other (verbal) points. Deep Space Nine, much like Brussels sprouts and Swiss armed neutrality, is underrated, etc. But here&#8217;s the interesting part (&#8220;We&#8217;ll be the judge of that,&#8221; &mdash; The Couch). A central theme of my speech was that conservatives should spend less time demonizing liberals and more time trying to understand why so many people find the liberal message of &#8220;community&#8221; appealing.<\/p>\n<p>I suggested that maybe what she took for my &#8220;antagonizing&#8221; could more plausibly be described as me offering &#8220;hard truths&#8221; she didn&#8217;t like hearing. This made her quite angry. One might even say it antagonized her. And that&#8217;s fair enough. No one likes being told that their anger stems not from being wrongly insulted but from being rightly told that they&#8217;re wrong (&#8220;Gimme a second; I&#8217;m still trying to follow that&#8221; &mdash; The Couch).<\/p>\n<p>Still, I find this representative of a lot of campus liberals. They seem to think that the first sin of conservatism is disagreeing with liberals, as if it is simply mean-spirited to think liberals are wrong. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Facts, Horrible Facts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Second perhaps only to the glories of women&#8217;s prison movies, this was one of the earliest themes of the G-File, going back to the ancient origins of <em>National Review Online<\/em>, when I would personally tattoo this &#8220;news&#8221;letter on the back of a dwarf and have him run to each reader and take his shirt off. It was really inefficient.<\/p>\n<p>What was I talking about? Oh right, the &#8220;meanness&#8221; of disagreement. Without getting into the weeds of the immigration or gun-control debates, there&#8217;s a certain liberal attitude that disagreement is just nasty. If you point out that background checks or &#8220;assault weapon&#8221; bans won&#8217;t work, the response is anger and frustration that you just don&#8217;t get it. <\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s because, as Emerson once said, &#8220;There is always a certain meanness in the argument of conservatism, joined with a certain superiority in its fact.&#8221; Whenever I talk to liberal college kids, I think of this line, because when I disagree with them it hurts their feelings (I would say their tears are delicious, but even I recoil at the image of me running out into the audience and licking the cheeks of weepy college kids).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In yesterday&#8217;s Goldberg File email, Jonah Goldberg talked about making a speech at Washington College the night before: During the Q&#038;A a very attractive girl who&#8217;d spent much of my talk rolling her eyes and chatting with her friend, asked me a pretty typical question. She asked, more or less: How can you expect the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[57,53,13],"tags":[431,517],"class_list":["post-20020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-humour","category-politics","category-usa","tag-conservatism","tag-republican"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-5cU","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20020","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20020"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20020\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20021,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20020\/revisions\/20021"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}