{"id":18215,"date":"2012-12-17T10:23:17","date_gmt":"2012-12-17T15:23:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=18215"},"modified":"2019-05-19T11:48:05","modified_gmt":"2019-05-19T15:48:05","slug":"camille-paglia-on-the-shallow-derivativeness-of-so-much-contemporary-art-which-has-no-big-ideas-left","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2012\/12\/17\/camille-paglia-on-the-shallow-derivativeness-of-so-much-contemporary-art-which-has-no-big-ideas-left\/","title":{"rendered":"Camille Paglia on “the shallow derivativeness of so much contemporary art, which has no big ideas left”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Emily Esfahani Smith<\/a> talks to Camille Paglia about her latest book, Glittering Images: A Journey Through Art From Egypt to Star Wars<\/em>:<\/p>\n

For Paglia, the spiritual quest defines all great art \u2014 all art that lasts. But in our secular age, the liberal crusade against religion has also taken a toll on art. \u201cSneering at religion is juvenile, symptomatic of a stunted imagination,\u201d Paglia writes. \u201cYet that cynical posture has become de rigueur<\/em> in the art world \u2014 simply another reason for the shallow derivativeness of so much contemporary art, which has no big ideas left.\u201d Historically the great art of the West has had religious themes, either explicit or implicit. \u201cThe Bible<\/em>, the basis for so much great art, moves deeper than anything coming out of the culture today,\u201d Paglia says. As a result of its spiritual bankruptcy, art is losing its prominence in our culture. \u201cArt makes news today,\u201d she writes, \u201conly when a painting is stolen or auctioned at a record price.\u201d<\/p>\n

[. . .]<\/p>\n

More than 20 years ago, Paglia took another journey through art in her breakout book Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson<\/em>. It launched her career as an irrepressible and politically incorrect cultural critic who was suddenly everywhere on the media circuit, speaking on topics ranging from Madonna and Elizabeth Taylor to date rape and educational reform. In the book, Paglia argued that Western culture has been a succession of shifting sexual personae (Mona Lisa is the original dominatrix; Dickinson was Amherst\u2019s Madame de Sade). The book contained all the Paglia hallmarks: an infatuation with sex and beauty, strong prose, and an evisceration of feminism. Needless to say, Sexual Personae<\/em> raised hackles and branded Paglia as the enfant terrible of academia and feminism.<\/p>\n

That was then. While she is still more than willing to dig into what is left of the feminist movement \u2014 \u201cfeminism today is anti-intellectual\u201d and \u201cdefined by paranoia,\u201d she says \u2014 these days, she directs the venom of her sharp tongue to the dogmatic champions of secularism, liberals who narrow-mindedly dismiss religion and God. There is one, in particular, whom she cannot stand: the late Christopher Hitchens \u2014 like her, a libertarian-minded atheist. The key difference between the two is that he despised religion and God while Paglia respects both and thinks they are funda\u00admental to Western culture and art. Paglia calls Hitchens \u201ca sybaritic narcissist committed to no real ideas outside his personal advancement.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

H\/T to Nick Packwood<\/a> for the link.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Emily Esfahani Smith talks to Camille Paglia about her latest book, Glittering Images: A Journey Through Art From Egypt to Star Wars: For Paglia, the spiritual quest defines all great art \u2014 all art that lasts. But in our secular age, the liberal crusade against religion has also taken a toll on art. \u201cSneering at […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":35193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,7,28,11],"tags":[102,1288,86],"class_list":["post-18215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-history","category-media","category-religion","tag-art","tag-camillepaglia","tag-criticism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/favicon.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-4JN","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18215"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48418,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18215\/revisions\/48418"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}