{"id":16620,"date":"2012-08-24T10:18:42","date_gmt":"2012-08-24T15:18:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=16620"},"modified":"2012-08-24T10:18:42","modified_gmt":"2012-08-24T15:18:42","slug":"the-new-malthusian-miserabilism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2012\/08\/24\/the-new-malthusian-miserabilism\/","title":{"rendered":"The new Malthusian miserabilism"},"content":{"rendered":"

Brendan O’Neill<\/a> on the once-again popular theories of Reverend Thomas Malthus:<\/p>\n

Malthusianism is back in vogue. Not only in theatres in Sloane Square, but across the opinion-forming spectrum. Last year, the human population hit seven billion, giving rise to a boom in handwringing commentary. BBC reporters tell us that \u2018uncontrolled population growth threatens to undermine efforts to save the planet\u2019. The Guardian\u2019s environment reporters are forever warning of the dangers of our \u2018rapidly growing global population\u2019. Then there\u2019s much-loved celebs like David Attenborough, who recently signed up to the population-panic group the Optimum Population Trust (OPT) and frequently declares: \u2018I\u2019ve never seen a problem that wouldn\u2019t be easier to solve with fewer people.\u2019<\/p>\n

The New Malthusians are getting cockier. At the UN Rio+20 Earth summit earlier this year, 105 respectable institutions, including Britain\u2019s increasingly Malthusian Royal Society, urged the international powers-that-be to look beyond the \u2018ethical sensitivities\u2019 around the population issue and \u2018confront rising global population\u2019. All those wailing babies mean we are now \u2018living beyond the planet\u2019s means\u2019, they declared. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is pumping millions of dollars into the distribution of birth-control tools in the developing world. Well-off westerners can now even offset their carbon emissions by helping to prevent the birth of babies in less fortunate places. A website called Pop Offsets, launched by the OPT, allows you to work out how much carbon you emit in your daily life and then tells you how many births you must help to prevent in order to offset that carbon. You make a financial contribution to a reproductive charity; that charity encourages a woman somewhere not to have more kids; and, hey presto, your personal emissions are cancelled out by your contribution to the non-creation of resource-demanding babies. The Guardian<\/em>\u2019s report on this initiative was illustrated with a photo of babies, 12 of them, just lying there like the problematic drains on nature.<\/p>\n

Malthusianism is so ingrained in the outlook of greens and other trendies that people can fantasise about loads of human beings dying off without anyone batting an eyelid. Population panic-merchants often claim that the \u2018carrying capacity\u2019 of the planet is two billion human beings, so at least five billion less than at present. In a discussion on Radio 3\u2019s super-respectable Nightwaves<\/em> a couple of years ago, the psychologist and writer Sue Blackmore declared: \u2018For the planet\u2019s sake, I hope we have bird flu or some other thing that will reduce the population, because otherwise we\u2019re doomed.\u2019 There were no complaints to the BBC: the idea that humans are a problem in need of a solution is widespread in respectable \u00adcircles.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Brendan O’Neill on the once-again popular theories of Reverend Thomas Malthus: Malthusianism is back in vogue. Not only in theatres in Sloane Square, but across the opinion-forming spectrum. Last year, the human population hit seven billion, giving rise to a boom in handwringing commentary. BBC reporters tell us that \u2018uncontrolled population growth threatens to undermine […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,65,74,7],"tags":[39,308,309,91],"class_list":["post-16620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-environment","category-food","category-history","tag-junkscience","tag-malthusianism","tag-overpopulation","tag-poverty"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-4k4","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16620"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16620\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16622,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16620\/revisions\/16622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}