{"id":16443,"date":"2012-08-13T09:10:59","date_gmt":"2012-08-13T14:10:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=16443"},"modified":"2012-08-13T09:10:59","modified_gmt":"2012-08-13T14:10:59","slug":"the-problems-of-conducting-science-by-press-release","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2012\/08\/13\/the-problems-of-conducting-science-by-press-release\/","title":{"rendered":"The problems of conducting science-by-press-release"},"content":{"rendered":"

At sp!ked<\/em>, Ben Pile<\/a> explains why the first casualties in the climate change debate are usually the facts:<\/p>\n

In plain sight of the fact that the melting was neither unexpected nor unprecedented, environmental journalists the world over picked up the story and ran with it. In the Guardian<\/em>, Suzanne Goldenberg, wrote: \u2018The Greenland ice sheet melted at a faster rate this month than at any other time in recorded history, with virtually the entire ice sheet showing signs of thaw.\u2019<\/p>\n

As I have noted elsewhere, Guardian<\/em> journalists have a fetish for stories about melting ice. In September last year, following an unusually low measurement of Arctic sea-ice extent, Damian Carrington wrote: \u2018Ice is the white flag being waved by our planet, under fire from the atmospheric attack being mounted by humanity.\u2019 But the low measurement of sea ice that Carrington pointed to disagreed with at least five other continuous measurements of the Arctic, and was thus unreliable. This kind of over-reaction to scientific developments are facile attempts to turn science into stories of political intrigue. When images of the Arctic taken by US spy satellites were declassified in 2009, the headline of an article by Goldenberg and Carrington proclaimed that \u2018the secret evidence of global warming Bush tried to hide\u2019 had been \u2018revealed\u2019.<\/p>\n

The rash of excited articles about the dying cryosphere caused some surprising corrective responses from voices within climate research. Malte Humpert from the Arctic Institute Centre wrote a stinging response to the headline histrionics. \u2018The Greenland ice sheet, which is up to 3000+ metres thick, is not \u201cmelting away\u201d, did not \u201cmelt in four days\u201d, it is not \u201cmelting fast\u201d, and Greenland did not \u201close 97 per cent of its surface ice layer\u201d.\u2019 Humpert continued: \u2018Most articles also exaggerated the importance of the melt event on global sea levels by explaining how sea levels would rise by up to 7.2 metres if the ice sheet were to melt.\u2019<\/p>\n

Similarly, Mark Brandon, a sea-ice scientist at the Open University, reproduced an interesting series of tweets and links to articles that showed the development of the current panic about ice, beginning with (alleged) comedian Marcus Brigstocke\u2019s misconception of the story. To Brigstocke, an \u2018unprecedented\u2019 melt was the proverbial canary in the coal mine — a harbinger of doom. But as Brandon and his colleagues pointed out, it was a bit soon to be calling time on the human race. This was just weather.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

At sp!ked, Ben Pile explains why the first casualties in the climate change debate are usually the facts: In plain sight of the fact that the melting was neither unexpected nor unprecedented, environmental journalists the world over picked up the story and ran with it. In the Guardian, Suzanne Goldenberg, wrote: \u2018The Greenland ice sheet […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,28,53,16],"tags":[245,240,39,51],"class_list":["post-16443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment","category-media","category-politics","category-science","tag-climatechange","tag-globalwarming","tag-junkscience","tag-pr"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-4hd","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16443"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16443\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16444,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16443\/revisions\/16444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}