{"id":16029,"date":"2012-07-13T00:04:24","date_gmt":"2012-07-13T05:04:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=16029"},"modified":"2012-07-12T14:20:09","modified_gmt":"2012-07-12T19:20:09","slug":"the-only-long-term-answer-to-road-congestion-real-time-tolls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2012\/07\/13\/the-only-long-term-answer-to-road-congestion-real-time-tolls\/","title":{"rendered":"The only long-term answer to road congestion: real-time tolls"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I know, I know &#8230; I hate paying road tolls as much as the next driver. But the current road pricing scheme is broken and getting broken-er. <a href=\"http:\/\/fullcomment.nationalpost.com\/2012\/07\/11\/andrew-coyne-smart-tolls-the-best-solution-to-our-traffic-woes\/\" target=\"_blank\">Andrew Coyne<\/a> points out the unpleasant realities:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230; the demand for road use \u2014 traffic \u2014 is not a fixed quantity. Like anything else, it fluctuates with the price. And the price to use the roads, under present policies, is denominated in time: that is, by how long people are prepared to stew in traffic. This is, when you think about it, perverse. The people who get first claim on the roads are the ones who put the lowest value on their time. Or in other words, the people who need them the least.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s why analysts have long recommended pricing roads in more conventional terms, i.e. dollars and cents. But there are lots of ways of getting even this wrong, so we need to eliminate a couple more alternatives, such as:<\/p>\n<p>More taxes. Many people\u2019s first response to the notion of pricing roads is to say \u201cbut I already pay a gas tax.\u201d The more knowledgeable will point to statistics showing that revenues from gas taxes more than pay for the cost of building and maintaining the roads.<\/p>\n<p>But these are far from the only costs at issue, or even the most important. As far as congestion is concerned the cost that matters is not the cost of building the road, but the cost of using it. Every time you use the road, you impose a cost on other drivers, so far as you make the roads that much more crowded \u2014 as they, of course, do you. Add up those costs over millions of drivers every day \u2014 costs measured not only in delays, but in more collisions, more wear and tear, more pollution, and so on \u2014 and we are well into the billions, according to several estimates.<\/p>\n<p>[. . .]<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s really needed, then, is a more comprehensive approach. With modern technology, there\u2019s no reason to toll only some roads and not others. Using GPS-style in-car transponders and satellites, it\u2019s now possible to charge drivers to use the roads generally, with the highest charges applying in downtown centres and at rush-hour \u2014 just as you pay a higher charge to use your cellphone depending on the location and time of day. You\u2019d even get a monthly bill in the mail.<\/p>\n<p>Far-fetched? Britain and the Netherlands have each been on the verge of adopting similar schemes in recent years. That each backed down in the end tells you something of the political sensitivities involved: It\u2019s always hard to get people to pay for things they are used to getting for free. But the roads aren\u2019t free. We\u2019re paying more and more to use them every year.<\/p>\n<p>Pay in congestion, in time and noise and aggravation \u2014 or pay by credit card. Once you think of it that way, the choice should be easy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I know, I know &#8230; I hate paying road tolls as much as the next driver. But the current road pricing scheme is broken and getting broken-er. Andrew Coyne points out the unpleasant realities: &#8230; the demand for road use \u2014 traffic \u2014 is not a fixed quantity. Like anything else, it fluctuates with the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,25,53,15,13],"tags":[111,711,118],"class_list":["post-16029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cancon","category-economics","category-politics","category-technology","category-usa","tag-cars","tag-infrastructure","tag-taxes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-4ax","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16029"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16029\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16031,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16029\/revisions\/16031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}