{"id":11299,"date":"2011-09-23T13:04:19","date_gmt":"2011-09-23T17:04:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=11299"},"modified":"2011-09-23T13:04:19","modified_gmt":"2011-09-23T17:04:19","slug":"the-cliche-meister-strikes-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2011\/09\/23\/the-cliche-meister-strikes-again\/","title":{"rendered":"The clich\u00e9-meister strikes again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424053111904194604576582534129735582.html?mod=WSJ_Books_LS_Books_8\" target=\"_blank\">Andrew Ferguson<\/a> reviews the book <em>That Used To Be Us<\/em> by Thomas L. Friedman and Michael Mandelbaum. He didn&#8217;t find it a pleasant read:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Mr. Friedman can turn a phrase into clich\u00e9 faster than any Madison Avenue jingle writer. He announces that &#8220;America declared war on math and physics.&#8221; Three paragraphs later, we learn that we&#8217;re &#8220;waging war on math and physics.&#8221; Three sentences later: &#8220;We went to war against math and physics.&#8221; And onto the next page: &#8220;We need a systemic response to both our math and physics challenges, not a war on both.&#8221; Three sentences later: We must &#8220;reverse the damage we have done by making war on both math and physics,&#8221; because, we learn two sentences later, soon the war on terror &#8220;won&#8217;t seem nearly as important as the wars we waged against physics and math.&#8221; He must think we&#8217;re idiots.<\/p>\n<p>The slovenliness of our language, George Orwell wrote, makes it easier to have foolish thoughts, and while Mr. Friedman&#8217;s language has been tidied up a bit, the thinking remains what it has always been. The authors call themselves &#8220;frustrated optimists.&#8221; Their frustration is owing to the depredations of the last decade, which they call (Mr. Mandelbaum nods) the Terrible Twos. But self-contradiction is also part of the Friedman brand. In many other passages, the authors specifically trace the American slide to the end of the Cold War &mdash; though still elsewhere they remark that the 1990s were &#8220;positive for America.&#8221; It doesn&#8217;t help their argument, such as it is, that the evidence of decline they cite &mdash; crumbling infrastructure, a failing public-education system &mdash; predates both 2001 and 1989 by a long stretch. Our potholes and schools have been favorites of declinists for generations.<\/p>\n<p>If the authors&#8217; frustration is unoriginal and ill-defined, their optimism is terrifying. America will rebound &mdash; we will become the us that we used to be again, you might say and Mr. Friedman does &mdash; when we regain our ability to do &#8220;big things&#8221; through &#8220;collective action.&#8221; Collective action is a phrase that means &#8220;the federal government.&#8221; Among the big things that we will do are rework American industry, through regulation and taxation, to drastically cut carbon emissions. Another one of our big things is a big increase in the gasoline tax. We will also impose on us a new big carbon tax. We will use revenues to create a &#8220;clean energy&#8221; industry with millions of &#8220;green jobs&#8221; like the ones that were eliminated earlier this month at Solyndra. Readers will wonder, like the early environmentalist Tonto, &#8220;What do you mean &#8216;we,&#8217; kemo sabe?&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>H\/T to Jon, my former virtual landlord, for the link.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Andrew Ferguson reviews the book That Used To Be Us by Thomas L. Friedman and Michael Mandelbaum. He didn&#8217;t find it a pleasant read: Mr. Friedman can turn a phrase into clich\u00e9 faster than any Madison Avenue jingle writer. He announces that &#8220;America declared war on math and physics.&#8221; Three paragraphs later, we learn that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,25,65,28,53],"tags":[86,354,400],"class_list":["post-11299","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-economics","category-environment","category-media","category-politics","tag-criticism","tag-georgeorwell","tag-language"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-2Wf","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11299","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11299"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11299\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11301,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11299\/revisions\/11301"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}