{"id":103788,"date":"2026-07-22T06:00:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-22T10:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=103788"},"modified":"2026-07-21T15:21:05","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T19:21:05","slug":"andy-burnhams-manchesterism-at-the-national-level","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2026\/07\/22\/andy-burnhams-manchesterism-at-the-national-level\/","title":{"rendered":"Andy Burnham’s “Manchesterism” at the national level"},"content":{"rendered":"

In The Critic<\/em>, Shimeon Lee<\/a> looks at Andy Burnham’s time as Mayor of Greater Manchester and what his record there says about how he will try to run Britain from No. 10:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s official MP portrait, July 2026.
\u00a9 House of Commons via Wikimedia Commons.<\/p><\/div>\n

Andy Burnham is now Prime Minister, and the country soon to discover what “Manchesterism” means when applied to the British state. Burnham’s nine years as mayor, alongside his earlier national record, offer a clear guide to the instincts he is likely to bring to No.10: a willingness to raise taxes, expand the state and prioritise policies that sound good but ultimately deliver poor value for money.<\/p>\n

It is revealing that after being elected mayor in 2017, one of Burnham’s first acts was to impose a new charge on households in Greater Manchester. The new mayoral precept was initially set at \u00a38 for the average band D property, funding the mayoral operation, including Burnham’s \u00a3110,000 salary. As so often happens with new charges, it did not remain modest for long. The charge more than doubled the following year, rising again in 2020-21, 2022-23, 2025-26 and 2026-27. By the time Burnham resigned to contest the Makerfield by-election, it had risen to \u00a361.75, nearly eight times the original amount in less than a decade.<\/p>\n

As residents paid more, the mayor built an increasingly elaborate network of advisers, commissioners and panels funded by taxpayers. These included a young person’s advisor paid \u00a3500 per day, a transport commissioner and an active travel commissioner each paid \u00a3650 per day, and an LGBTQ+ advisor paid \u00a3177 per day. He also established seven equality panels facilitated by “culturally appropriate organisations” which cost \u00a3392,435 a year. Taxpayers can only speculate how much larger that ecosystem could become when he takes control of Whitehall.<\/p>\n

The mayoral precept was not the only tax rise implemented by Burnham. As mayor, he raised every tax under his control. The band D police precept rose from \u00a3162.30 when he entered office to \u00a3285.30 by the time he left, a 76 per cent increase. At the same time, the fire precept increased from \u00a359.95 to \u00a392.20, a 54 per cent increase. Both increases substantially outstripped cumulative inflation of 37.5 per cent during that period.<\/p>\n

Even that understates his tax-raising ambition, as it only includes the charges he managed to implement. In 2019, Burnham proposed a clean air zone for Greater Manchester which would impose a daily charge on commercial vehicles that did not comply with environmental standards: \u00a37.50 per day for taxis, \u00a310 per day on vans and \u00a360 per day on buses, coaches and heavy goods vehicles. These would have added thousands of pounds a year to local businesses’ costs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In The Critic, Shimeon Lee looks at Andy Burnham’s time as Mayor of Greater Manchester and what his record there says about how he will try to run Britain from No. 10: Andy Burnham is now Prime Minister, and the country soon to discover what “Manchesterism” means when applied to the British state. Burnham’s nine […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[4,25,84,53],"tags":[1631,86,143,816,118],"class_list":["post-103788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-economics","category-government","category-politics","tag-andyburnham","tag-criticism","tag-labour","tag-manchester","tag-taxes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-r00","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103788"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103788\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":103790,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103788\/revisions\/103790"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}