{"id":101417,"date":"2026-03-19T03:00:56","date_gmt":"2026-03-19T07:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=101417"},"modified":"2026-03-18T11:22:00","modified_gmt":"2026-03-18T15:22:00","slug":"government-creates-a-problem-yet-the-solution-is-always-more-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2026\/03\/19\/government-creates-a-problem-yet-the-solution-is-always-more-government\/","title":{"rendered":"Government creates a problem &#8211; yet the solution is always &#8220;more government!&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the social media site formerly known as <em>Twitter<\/em>, <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/WayneMathison\/status\/2034102291268333836\" target=\"_blank\">L. Wayne Mathison<\/a> explains the vast drawbacks of asking governments to solve problems:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Bureaucracy-L.-Wayne-Mathison.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Bureaucracy-L.-Wayne-Mathison-853x569.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"853\" height=\"569\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-101418\" srcset=\"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Bureaucracy-L.-Wayne-Mathison-853x569.jpg 853w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Bureaucracy-L.-Wayne-Mathison-480x320.jpg 480w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Bureaucracy-L.-Wayne-Mathison-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Bureaucracy-L.-Wayne-Mathison-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Bureaucracy-L.-Wayne-Mathison.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 853px) 100vw, 853px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Government bureaucracy is like a snow machine that keeps blasting, then hires more people to shovel the mess it just made.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;re told it exists to help. To protect. To serve. Nice story. But in practice, it behaves more like a self-preserving organism. It doesn&#8217;t solve problems cleanly. It multiplies them, then offers to manage the mess it helped create.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the part most people miss. Bureaucracies don&#8217;t grow because problems get bigger. They grow because complexity gets rewarded. The more tangled the system, the more valuable the people who run it. That&#8217;s not a bug. That&#8217;s the incentive structure.<\/p>\n<p>William Niskanen called this decades ago. Bureaucrats maximize budgets, not results. Bigger department, bigger influence. If a problem gets solved too efficiently, the machine loses a reason to exist. So problems don&#8217;t disappear. They get &#8220;managed&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Then comes the language game.<\/p>\n<p>Confusion gets dressed up as compassion.<br \/>\nA program no one understands becomes &#8220;comprehensive&#8221;.<br \/>\nA policy that creates dependency becomes &#8220;support&#8221;.<br \/>\nFailure becomes &#8220;underfunding&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s like hiring a mechanic who loosens parts just to bill you for tightening them later.<\/p>\n<p>Now zoom in on Canada. Then zoom in tighter on Manitoba.<\/p>\n<p>We don&#8217;t just have bureaucracy. We have an oversized public sector that&#8217;s crowding out the very engine that pays for it. In Manitoba especially, government employment makes up a huge slice of the workforce compared to the private sector that actually generates wealth. More administrators, fewer producers.<\/p>\n<p>And here&#8217;s the quiet problem. Public sector growth doesn&#8217;t face the same discipline as the private sector. If a business bloats, it dies. If a department bloats, it asks for more funding.<\/p>\n<p>So the balance drifts.<\/p>\n<p>More people administering. Fewer people building, investing, risking.<br \/>\nMore rules. Less output.<br \/>\nMore spending. Slower growth.<\/p>\n<p>It creates a kind of economic inversion. The part of society that redistributes wealth starts to outweigh the part that creates it. That&#8217;s not sustainable. It&#8217;s like living off the interest of a bank account you&#8217;ve stopped contributing to.<\/p>\n<p>Politicians don&#8217;t fix this because growth is easy to sell. Cuts are not. No one gets applause for saying, &#8220;We&#8217;re going to do less&#8221;. So the system expands in one direction only.<\/p>\n<p>Forward. Always forward. Never back.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, taxpayers are handed the bill and told it&#8217;s the price of caring.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the hard reframe. Bureaucracy isn&#8217;t malfunctioning. It&#8217;s doing exactly what it&#8217;s rewarded to do. Expand. Protect itself. Justify its existence.<\/p>\n<p>If you want a different outcome, you need different incentives.<\/p>\n<p>Measure outcomes, not spending.<br \/>\nReward efficiency, not headcount.<br \/>\nShrink what doesn&#8217;t work, no matter how &#8220;important&#8221; it sounds.<\/p>\n<p>Because if you don&#8217;t trim the machine, it doesn&#8217;t stay the same size.<\/p>\n<p>It learns to eat.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On the social media site formerly known as Twitter, L. Wayne Mathison explains the vast drawbacks of asking governments to solve problems: Government bureaucracy is like a snow machine that keeps blasting, then hires more people to shovel the mess it just made. We&#8217;re told it exists to help. To protect. To serve. Nice story. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,6,84],"tags":[509,755,95,261,682],"class_list":["post-101417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bureaucracy","category-cancon","category-government","tag-civilservice","tag-incentives","tag-jobs","tag-management","tag-manitoba"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-qnL","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101417"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101417\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":101419,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101417\/revisions\/101419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}