{"id":100426,"date":"2026-01-20T03:00:08","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T08:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=100426"},"modified":"2026-01-19T12:22:58","modified_gmt":"2026-01-19T17:22:58","slug":"the-us-navys-twenty-years-to-forget","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2026\/01\/20\/the-us-navys-twenty-years-to-forget\/","title":{"rendered":"The US Navy’s twenty years to forget"},"content":{"rendered":"

CDR Salamander<\/a> takes a wincing glance back at the ship development programs the US Navy planned to implement early in the 2000s and how they all failed to meet even minimal expectations:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

20 years seems like a long time, but in many ways it is not. As we look forward to what our fleet will look like at mid-century, we should look back to what we were all promised in January of 2005 that was going to transform<\/em> into the Navy of the 21st century.<\/p>\n

There were four ship classes that were going to be the surface fleet that we were promised at the time, were going to ensure America’s dominance at sea for the next half century.<\/p>\n

(NB: most of the hypertext links below go to the tags from my OG Blog that predate my move to Substack three years ago. Those will point you towards my writing two decades ago or so on these programs at the time, if you are so interested.)<\/em><\/p>\n

LCS<\/a>. We were once supposed to get 55 of the marketing\/consultancy-named Littoral Combat Ship<\/em>. We’ll wind up with 25. Not suitable for combat in the littorals, but steps are being made to get some use out of them … somehow.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

DDG-1000<\/a>. We were once going to have 32 of these. We got three. Its main weapon, the two 155mm guns, were never made operational and are being removed. The ships are being turned into weapons demonstrators for Conventional Prompt Strike. I hear great things about the engineering plant, but they have yet to do a proper deployment, nine and a half years after the commissioning of hull-1.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Ford Class CVN<\/a>. A dozen years ago, we thought it would deploy with UAVs as you can see below (pause for a moment in honor of the martyred X-47B, the greatest crime of the Obama Era Navy<\/em>), but no. Hull-1 took 8 years to commission. Hull-2 will take 12. Can’t seem to have a workable CHT system.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

CG(X)<\/a>. In 2005, we thought we would build at least 19. Complete loss of control of the program to the point it was put out of its misery. We still don’t have a proper carrier escort. Looks like the Japanese will build what we should have, and the only hope we have now is … BBG-1.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Why dig all this institutional shame and dishonor up, again? Simple, we need to be humble, and the leaders today need to hoist onboard the errors of the past.<\/p>\n

Now, back to last week. For our fleet of the 2030s and on to face the world’s largest navy (in 2005 it was the US Navy. Now it is the People’s Liberation Army Navy. Well done everyone<\/em>), there are three ships right now that we have to ponder as our future surface force.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CDR Salamander takes a wincing glance back at the ship development programs the US Navy planned to implement early in the 2000s and how they all failed to meet even minimal expectations: 20 years seems like a long time, but in many ways it is not. As we look forward to what our fleet will […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[7,5,13,663],"tags":[617,140,156,174,30,61],"class_list":["post-100426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","category-military","category-usa","category-weapons","tag-carriers","tag-design","tag-fail","tag-innovation","tag-navy","tag-ships"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-q7M","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100426"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100431,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100426\/revisions\/100431"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}