{"id":100286,"date":"2026-01-12T05:00:54","date_gmt":"2026-01-12T10:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/?p=100286"},"modified":"2026-01-11T20:51:15","modified_gmt":"2026-01-12T01:51:15","slug":"britains-new-war-against-misogyny","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/2026\/01\/12\/britains-new-war-against-misogyny\/","title":{"rendered":"Britain’s new “war against misogyny”"},"content":{"rendered":"

At Oxford Sour<\/em>, Christopher Gage<\/a> explains how a Netflix show ended up as a key exhibit in the British chattering classes’ latest crusade:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Under our Labour government, the dictionary of euphemisms has swollen to rival War and Peace<\/em>. Each day mints a fresh brick of Lego Language \u2014 words pressed together into sentence shapes that feel moral without actually meaning anything. Euphemism is not just annoying speech; it is a habit of mind. The mouth that traffics in euphemisms aligns with the mind that thinks in euphemisms too.<\/p>\n

Nowhere is this clearer than in Labour’s declared War on Misogyny. According to our betters, Britain is a scorched plain over which misogynists roam, knuckles dragging, hypnotised by Andrew Tate and the Manosphere. These creatures, we are told, stalk the land, muttering statistics about male athletic advantage like a swarm of demented Daleks.<\/p>\n

Our Labour government, its approval rating currently three percent lower than the percentage of Brits who believe there is a monster living in Loch Ness Lake, will train teachers to spot misogyny in boys and send “high-risk” offenders to courses to “tackle the root causes of misogyny”.<\/p>\n

\n

Misogyny, however, is not a vibes-based category. The word comes from the Ancient Greek misos<\/em> (hatred) and gun\u0113<\/em> (woman): hatred of women. Until recently, it described a pathological condition involving fear, control, and violence directed at women. Such brutal men exist. They always have. But are they representative of the average British schoolboy doom-scrolling through social-media nonsense? Press X to doubt.<\/p>\n

Yet this is where the campaign now lands: in classrooms of adolescent boys, taught to interrogate their latent depravity before it has manifested. It is not behaviour being punished, but probability.<\/p>\n

In a culture strapped to the algorithm, only the most extreme definitions float to the surface. The brain, trained by screens, learns to seek the sensational, the novel, the ludicrous. And so, Labour shapes its moral imagination on content rather than evidence.<\/p>\n

The Netflix drama Adolescence<\/em> perfectly captures this drift. For the unacquainted, the series \u2014 an incel murder story drugged liberally with “that Andrew Tate shit” \u2014 was received as revealed truth. For The Guardian<\/em>, it was “the best TV show ever”. It was not. Even a semi-literate eye would charge Adolescence<\/em> as, well … adolescent.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, Adolescence<\/em> assumed the status of revealed truth. On a BBC news panel, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch was interrogated for admitting she had not yet seen it. Middle-class parents dutifully watched alongside their sons, scanning their offspring for signs of misogyny leaking from its gills. Fiction hardened into diagnosis.<\/p>\n

Life now imitates social media. Labour’s plan to tackle misogyny appears lifted directly from the website formerly known as Twitter. Schools will teach boys that it is not acceptable to act like barbarians. One wonders who imagined otherwise.<\/p>\n

\n

What these awareness seminars will not address \u2014 naturally \u2014 are the forms of misogyny that are neither hypothetical nor algorithmically inferred, but routine, organised, and existing beyond a Twitter feed or a Netflix menu.<\/p>\n

They will not dwell on forced veiling, female genital mutilation, so-called honour violence, or acid attacks \u2014 practices documented in Britain and overwhelmingly concentrated within small but electorally critical<\/em> communities governed by brutal patriarchal codes.<\/p>\n

A rational observer might reasonably conclude that such practices meet any serious definition of misogyny: not ironic hatred, not incel posturing, but actual coercion, violence, and control exercised over women’s bodies and lives. You know, the very domination that Iranian women (and men) are currently risking their lives \u2014 quite literally<\/em> \u2014 to uproot.<\/p>\n

Yet these realities remain untouched and unmentioned, whilst classrooms revert into courtrooms enlisted to pre-emptively correct the imagined sins of adolescent boys. The reason is not moral complexity but political convenience. Euphemism thrives where naming the problem would threaten electoral arithmetic.<\/p>\n

And so, the language grows ever softer around real brutality, even as it hardens against boys whose only crime is to physically resemble a fictitious incel murderer on Netflix.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

At Oxford Sour, Christopher Gage explains how a Netflix show ended up as a key exhibit in the British chattering classes’ latest crusade: Under our Labour government, the dictionary of euphemisms has swollen to rival War and Peace. Each day mints a fresh brick of Lego Language \u2014 words pressed together into sentence shapes that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,28,53],"tags":[374,1020,139,593,504,101,1238],"class_list":["post-100286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-britain","category-media","category-politics","tag-children","tag-progressives","tag-psychology","tag-socialmedia","tag-teenagers","tag-tv","tag-virtuesignalling"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2hpV6-q5w","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100286"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100286\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100287,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100286\/revisions\/100287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/quotulatiousness.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}