<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quotulatiousness &#187; Alabama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/tag/alabama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Quotations, comments, and whatever else I&#039;m interested in at the moment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If you like Eminent Domain, you&#8217;ll love Montgomery&#8217;s version</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2010/08/26/if-you-like-eminent-domain-youll-love-montgomerys-version/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2010/08/26/if-you-like-eminent-domain-youll-love-montgomerys-version/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EminentDomain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=5093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christina Walsh reports on an Alabama city&#8217;s even-more-tyrannical-than-eminent-domain law: Imagine you come home from work one day to a notice on your front door that you have 45 days to demolish your house, or the city will do it for you. Oh, and you’re paying for it. This is happening right now in Montgomery, Ala., [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/26/eminent-domain-by-any-other-name-still-stinks/" target="_blank">Christina Walsh</a> reports on an Alabama city&#8217;s even-more-tyrannical-than-eminent-domain law:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Imagine you come home from work one day to a notice on your front door that you have 45 days to demolish your house, or the city will do it for you.  Oh, and you’re paying for it.</p>
<p>This is happening right now in Montgomery, Ala., and here is how it works: The city decides it doesn’t like your property for one reason or another, so it declares it a “public nuisance.”  It mails you a notice that you have 45 days to demolish your property, at your expense, or the city will do it for you (and, of course, bill you).</p>
<p>Your tab with the city will constitute a lien on your property, and if you don’t pay it within 30 days (or pay your installments on time; if you owe over $10,000, you can work out a deal to pay back the city for destroying your home over a period of time, with interest), the city can sell your now-vacant land to the highest bidder.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>H/T to <a href="https://twitter.com/IJ/status/22182101202" target="_blank">Institute For Justice</a> for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2010/08/26/if-you-like-eminent-domain-youll-love-montgomerys-version/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama belatedly bans &#8220;indecent&#8221; wine</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2009/09/03/alabama-belatedly-bans-indecent-wine/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2009/09/03/alabama-belatedly-bans-indecent-wine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absurd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three years after it started being sold in the state, Alabama decided that this is indecent: Slashfood reports: Wine and scantily clad women may sound like some cad&#8217;s idea of a good time, but the combo spells trouble in Alabama, which last week banned the sale of a California-made wine bottle adorned with a naked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three years after it started being sold in the state, Alabama decided that this is indecent:</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Cycles_Gladiator_label.jpg"><img src="http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Cycles_Gladiator_label.jpg" alt="Cycles_Gladiator_label" title="Cycles_Gladiator_label" width="425" height="330" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-801" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.slashfood.com/2009/08/06/alabama-declares-wine-bottle-indecent/" target="_blank">Slashfood</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Wine and scantily clad women may sound like some cad&#8217;s idea of a good time, but the combo spells trouble in Alabama, which last week banned the sale of a California-made wine bottle adorned with a naked nymph &mdash; helping boost its sales elsewhere in the nation.</p>
<p>Pursuant to the state&#8217;s administrative code, the Alabama Beverage Control Board ordered Hahn Family Wines to remove its Cycles Gladiator wines from shelves throughout the state, calling its label &#8220;immodest.&#8221; According to Hahn president Bill Legion, a small state board in Alabama rejected the artwork last year, but the ruling did not catch Legion&#8217;s eye. His apparent defiance of the state&#8217;s decision &mdash; he claims the paperwork &#8220;fell through the cracks&#8221; &mdash; led to the ban.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s turned out to be a great thing for us,&#8221; laughs Legion, who says he&#8217;s received calls of support from oenophiles around the world.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried the Cabernet Sauvignon, but I did have a few glasses of their Pinot Noir last week . . . very nice, although rather more full bodied than traditional Pinot (Burgundy, where pinot noir is the primary red wine grape, is a cool climate zone, as are most of the other well known pinot producer regions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2009/09/03/alabama-belatedly-bans-indecent-wine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
