<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quotulatiousness &#187; Humour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/category/humour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Quotations, comments, and whatever else I&#039;m interested in at the moment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The perils of misreading</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/21/the-perils-of-misreading/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/21/the-perils-of-misreading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=15158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a Twitter update from MHQjournal, linking to a brief news piece: #Theater: One-Man Play Takes Controversial look at Robert E Lee http://goo.gl/news/SyBu Hope they did enough research to get the nuances right. I slightly misread the name of the play as &#8220;Robert E. Lee &#8212; 50 Shades of Gray&#8221;, and thought it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a Twitter update from <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/MHQjournal/statuses/204557946535944192" target="_blank">MHQjournal</a>, linking to a brief news piece: </p>
<blockquote><p>#Theater: One-Man Play Takes Controversial look at Robert E Lee <a href="https://secure.marketwatch.com/story/one-man-play-takes-a-controversial-look-at-americas-past-during-the-150th-civil-war-anniversary-2012-05-21?shr=t" target="_blank">http://goo.gl/news/SyBu</a> Hope they did enough research to get the nuances right.</p></blockquote>
<p>I slightly misread the name of the play as &#8220;Robert E. Lee &mdash; <b>50</b> Shades of Gray&#8221;, and thought it was a very odd notion to have the very paragon of an upright, pious southern gentlemen reading from a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty_Shades_of_Grey" target="_blank">modern erotica novel&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/21/the-perils-of-misreading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The answer to that burning question &#8220;Are libertarians misitreperted?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/21/the-answer-to-that-burning-question-are-libertarians-misitreperted/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/21/the-answer-to-that-burning-question-are-libertarians-misitreperted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=15156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interview with Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie in Salon gets the garble-for-comedy-gold treatment through Google Translate and Contentbot: Chips Gillespie and Matt Welch, the writers of your primary libertarian distribution&#038;Number160Reason, see pray for their many other People in the usa raising disenchantment while using governmental process. For their new publication &#038;Promise of Independents: How [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interview with Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie in <em>Salon</em> gets the <a href="http://www.clothes-news.com/?p=753" target="_blank">garble-for-comedy-gold treatment</a> through Google Translate and Contentbot:</p>
<blockquote><p>Chips Gillespie and Matt Welch, the writers of your primary libertarian distribution&#038;Number160Reason, see pray for their many other People in the usa raising disenchantment while using governmental process. For their new publication &#038;Promise of Independents: How Libertarian State policies Can Fix Whats Inappropriate With North america, they realize that independents now account for the best bloc of voters near your vicinity and craving far more defections from the two significant events. Only by taking apart this hierarchical process of electric power, they retain, will any of us achieve true deregulation of authorities-manage solutions, that will result in elevated shopper decision and a far more carefully democratized contemporary society.</p>
<p>Say what you want to about libertarian reasons, but they will be constantly entertaining to go about. So that we sat all the way down with Gillespie and Welch the 2009 weeks time and talked about their beliefs over the sushi the afternoon meal:</p>
<p>Your publication cravings the United states consumer to embrace an unregulated market free from authorities management. However you also have a quotation from Julian Assange, a self applied-described libertarian, stating that &#038;a complimentary market results as being a monopoly if you do not power it to be free. You to get, some alternative entire body has to are available so that the liberty of an market &#038;Number8212 doesn’t that imply that free financial markets are inextricable from some sort of authorities management? </p></blockquote>
<p>H/T to <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/nickgillespie/statuses/204555464921448448" target="_blank">Nick Gillespie</a> for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/21/the-answer-to-that-burning-question-are-libertarians-misitreperted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Singularity, ruined by lawyers</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/15/the-singularity-ruined-by-lawyers/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/15/the-singularity-ruined-by-lawyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 05:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TheSingularity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=15063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Credit to Tom Scott. H/T to Michael O&#8217;Connor Clarke.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/IFe9wiDfb0E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Credit to <a href="http://www.tomscott.com/life/" target="_blank">Tom Scott</a>. H/T to <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/michaelocc/statuses/202070266451464193" target="_blank">Michael O&#8217;Connor Clarke</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/15/the-singularity-ruined-by-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Feschuk on the Cannes line-up</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/12/scott-feschuk-on-the-cannes-line-up/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/12/scott-feschuk-on-the-cannes-line-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 14:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parody]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=15029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not so much with the accuracy in titles, but certainly accurate on content: The Cannes Film Festival is once again showcasing its usual fare of upbeat, crowd-pleasing entertainment. I’ve not entirely been paying attention, but here’s what’s playing so far as I can tell: Despair and Isolation &#8212; Several orphans struggle to comprehend the human [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so much with the accuracy in titles, but certainly <a href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/its-french-for-blockbuster/" target="_blank">accurate on content</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Cannes Film Festival is once again showcasing its usual fare of upbeat, crowd-pleasing entertainment. I’ve not entirely been paying attention, but here’s what’s playing so far as I can tell:</p>
<p><em>Despair and Isolation</em> &mdash; Several orphans struggle to comprehend the human condition in a cruel world where the only constants are heartbreak and suffering. Running time: six hours.</p>
<p><em>Isolation, Despair and also Anguish</em> &mdash; Several thinner orphans struggle to comprehend the human condition while wheezing in a crueller world where the only constants are heartbreak, suffering and their leprosy (the skin kind and the social kind). Running time: six hours.</p>
<p><em>Despair, Anguish, Further Anguish and a Shaky Hand-held Camera</em> &mdash; Several orphans struggle to comprehend the human condition, but without going outside, because the film’s budget is only $19. Running time: 33 hours (couldn’t afford fancy “editing” machine).</p>
<p>[. . .]</p>
<p><em>The Triumph of Love</em> &mdash; Turns out the title is pretty misleading. This “Love” guy is a serial killer who targets orphans whose parents were murdered by other serial killers who themselves were orphans.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/12/scott-feschuk-on-the-cannes-line-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrating the birthday of F. A. Hayek</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/08/celebrating-the-birthday-of-f-a-hayek/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/08/celebrating-the-birthday-of-f-a-hayek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FederalReserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GreatDepression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parody]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=14966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the sequel, which some think is even better than the original, Fight of the Century:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d0nERTFo-Sk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>And the sequel, which some think is even better than the original, <em>Fight of the Century</em>:</p>
<p align="center"><iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GTQnarzmTOc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/08/celebrating-the-birthday-of-f-a-hayek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Duel at Blood Creek, a short film</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/01/the-duel-at-blood-creek-a-short-film/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/01/the-duel-at-blood-creek-a-short-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=14866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lovely little film that works well on several different levels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/13121783" width="800" height="450" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p>A lovely little film that works well on several different levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/01/the-duel-at-blood-creek-a-short-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Onion: Every Potential 2040 President Already Unelectable Due To Facebook</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/01/the-onion-every-potential-2040-president-already-unelectable-due-to-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/01/the-onion-every-potential-2040-president-already-unelectable-due-to-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 13:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ElectionWatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=14860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/A2bniFJigI0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/05/01/the-onion-every-potential-2040-president-already-unelectable-due-to-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QotD: Bankers, Marx&#8217;s dream workers</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/29/qotd-bankers-marxs-dream-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/29/qotd-bankers-marxs-dream-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=14846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a way bankers are Marx&#8217;s dream, it&#8217;s the workers getting the fruits of their labours. It&#8217;s funny that the left is usually angry at shareholders, for taking money out of companies and thereby bringing down workers&#8217; salaries. Yet with the banks they want shareholders to press the banks to do exactly that, and curb [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In a way bankers are Marx&#8217;s dream, it&#8217;s the workers getting the fruits of their labours. It&#8217;s funny that the left is usually angry at shareholders, for taking money out of companies and thereby bringing down workers&#8217; salaries. Yet with the banks they want shareholders to press the banks to do exactly that, and curb pay.</p>
<p>Joris Luyendijk, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/joris-luyendijk-banking-blog/2012/apr/28/banks-accounts-external-auditor" target="_blank">&#8220;External auditor: &#8216;Nobody at a bank can have a complete overview any more&#8217;&#8221;, <em>The Guardian</em></a>, 2012-04-28</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/29/qotd-bankers-marxs-dream-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney&#8217;s biggest challenge in selecting a running mate</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/26/romneys-biggest-challenge-in-selecting-a-running-mate/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/26/romneys-biggest-challenge-in-selecting-a-running-mate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ElectionWatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MittRomney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=14796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Chapman outlines the big issue that Mitt Romney needs to consider while ruminating over who&#8217;ll be his running mate this year: As he begins his search for a running mate, Mitt Romney needs to keep one question foremost in his mind, because the decision could affect us all for years to come. He needs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://reason.com/archives/2012/04/26/the-right-running-mate" target="_blank">Steve Chapman</a> outlines the big issue that Mitt Romney needs to consider while ruminating over who&#8217;ll be his running mate this year:</p>
<blockquote><p>As he begins his search for a running mate, Mitt Romney needs to keep one question foremost in his mind, because the decision could affect us all for years to come. He needs to ask: Will this person be good for American comedy?</p>
<p>The prospective Republican nominee will have a tough time living up to recent standards. It&#8217;s hard to imagine a Romney vice president who would inspire a story like the one in <em>The Onion</em>: &#8220;Shirtless Biden Washes Trans Am In White House Driveway.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nobody is ever going to have a run like Tina Fey had with Sarah Palin. The chances are slim that the next veep will accidentally shoot someone in the face.</p>
<p>[. . .]</p>
<p>Dan Quayle instantly became a national joke while riding to victory with George H.W. Bush in 1988. Geraldine Ferraro, the first woman on a major party ticket in 1984, couldn&#8217;t keep Ronald Reagan from capturing 55 percent of the female vote.</p>
<p>In 2000, when Al Gore picked Joe Lieberman to be the first Jewish running mate, the Democratic share of the Jewish vote soared to 79 percent &mdash; from 78 percent four years earlier. Dick Cheney brought the GOP the shimmering promise of Wyoming&#8217;s three electoral votes, which hadn&#8217;t gone to a Democrat since 1964.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a rare vice presidential nominee who affects the outcome. Even if Palin hadn&#8217;t cost John McCain 2 percent of the overall vote, as one study calculated, Barack Obama would still be president.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/26/romneys-biggest-challenge-in-selecting-a-running-mate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An excerpt from John Scalzi&#8217;s latest novel, Redshirts</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/24/an-excerpt-from-john-scalzis-latest-novel-redshirts/</link>
		<comments>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/24/an-excerpt-from-john-scalzis-latest-novel-redshirts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=14757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Scalzi felt some sympathy for the poor lads and lasses who wear the Redshirt &#8230; the ones who only show up for the first few minutes of the show and die gruesomely, leaving the heroes to carry on. His latest novel is a bit of payback for all the members of the &#8220;away teams&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Scalzi felt some sympathy for the poor lads and lasses who wear the Redshirt &#8230; the ones who only show up for the first few minutes of the show and die gruesomely, leaving the heroes to carry on. His <a href="http://www.tor.com/stories/2012/03/redshirts-prologue-chapter-1-a-2-excerpt" target="_blank">latest novel</a> is a bit of payback for all the members of the &#8220;away teams&#8221; who never came back.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.tor.com/stories/2012/03/redshirts-prologue-chapter-1-a-2-excerpt" target="_blank"><img src="http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Redshirts_John_Scalzi.png" alt="" title="Redshirts_John_Scalzi" width="410" height="612" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-14758" /><br />Click the image to see the first five chapters at the Tor.com website</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2012/04/24/an-excerpt-from-john-scalzis-latest-novel-redshirts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

