<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exact terminology aids understanding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2010/03/03/exact-terminology-aids-understanding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2010/03/03/exact-terminology-aids-understanding/</link>
	<description>Quotations, comments, and whatever else I&#039;m interested in at the moment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whit</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2010/03/03/exact-terminology-aids-understanding/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Whit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=2949#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking and quoting!  And thanks for reading!  I&#039;ve enjoyed touring around your blogs as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking and quoting!  And thanks for reading!  I&#8217;ve enjoyed touring around your blogs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junk Science Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/2010/03/03/exact-terminology-aids-understanding/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Junk Science Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quotulatiousness.ca/blog/?p=2949#comment-843</guid>
		<description>The agitprop coming from the media and government thrives on ambiguous terminology. When 15 year-old persons are expected to volunteer for a politically-oriented national make-work program, they&#039;re young adults, but if those same persons want to work in a factory, they&#039;re children. The same distinction is subject to misuse just about everywhere the term child is used in a legal context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The agitprop coming from the media and government thrives on ambiguous terminology. When 15 year-old persons are expected to volunteer for a politically-oriented national make-work program, they&#8217;re young adults, but if those same persons want to work in a factory, they&#8217;re children. The same distinction is subject to misuse just about everywhere the term child is used in a legal context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

