Quotulatiousness

August 11, 2009

So much for the right to not self-incriminate

Filed under: Britain, Law, Liberty — Tags: , , — Nicholas @ 12:24

The headline really does tell the story: Two convicted for refusal to decrypt data: Up to five years in jail after landmark prosecutions. You will provide the key, citizen . . . or you’ll do hard time:

Two people have been successfully prosecuted for refusing to provide authorities with their encryption keys, resulting in landmark convictions that may have carried jail sentences of up to five years.

The government said today it does not know their fate.

The power to force people to unscramble their data was granted to authorities in October 2007. Between 1 April, 2008 and 31 March this year the first two convictions were obtained.

The disclosure was made by Sir Christopher Rose, the government’s Chief Surveillance Commissioner, in his recent annual report.

The former High Court judge did not provide details of the crimes being investigated in the case of the individuals &mash; who were not necessarily suspects — nor of the sentences they received.

2 Comments

  1. Do you have the right to not self-incriminate in the UK?

    Comment by Lickmuffin — August 11, 2009 @ 13:56

  2. Clearly not anymore, if you ever did. One of the disadvantages of moving from a predominantly common law system to an encoded law system is that the encoded system tends to bias toward the state and against the individual.

    Comment by Nicholas — August 11, 2009 @ 14:45

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress